D. Paul
Puritan Board Sophomore
Is this a fair representation of Covenant THeology? Let's hope not...
http://www.biblicalreader.com/books/future/future_appendb.htm
http://www.biblicalreader.com/books/future/future_appendb.htm
Here's an..."interesting" critique
- Thread starter D. Paul
- Start date
- Status
JohnV
Puritan Board Post-Graduate
Donald:
I got about three or so paragraphs in and just couldn't keep up with all his footnotes proving his historical accuracy. I was done in by them....... NOT!
Not a single footnote to prove his historical summary of Covenant Theology. But, interesting enough, Covenant Theology is wrong for standing on its eschatological guess, (which it doesn't at all, by the way), but his theological system, built on Premillennialism is OK. Kind of strange, wouldn't you say?
I got about three or so paragraphs in and just couldn't keep up with all his footnotes proving his historical accuracy. I was done in by them....... NOT!
Not a single footnote to prove his historical summary of Covenant Theology. But, interesting enough, Covenant Theology is wrong for standing on its eschatological guess, (which it doesn't at all, by the way), but his theological system, built on Premillennialism is OK. Kind of strange, wouldn't you say?
BlackCalvinist
Puritan Board Senior
His entire premise is ludicrous, as there are people who hold to CT and are premillennial.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
