Gnostics and Calvinism

Status
Not open for further replies.
blhowes

blhowes

Puritan Board Professor
Any history buffs out there? I read yesterday at a site that's opposed to Calvinism that the early church rejected the teachings of Calvinism. They mentioned that the Gnostics believed in Calvinism and the church rejected the Gnostics and their teachings.

I don't have time right now to investigate it, so I was wondering if anybody's studied the Gnostics and might shed some light on this?

Thanks,
Bob
 
I would be curious to see what they are saying and where exactly they are coming from, but it sounds like complete garbage to me.

Calvinism and Gnosticism have nothing in common. The latter was refuted by the Apostles Creed, and all orthodox creeds since, particularly in the Westminster Confession. Gnosticism is a heresy and Calvinism is orthodoxy.
 
Originally posted by blhowes
Any history buffs out there? I read yesterday at a site that's opposed to Calvinism that the early church rejected the teachings of Calvinism. They mentioned that the Gnostics believed in Calvinism and the church rejected the Gnostics and their teachings.

I don't have time right now to investigate it, so I was wondering if anybody's studied the Gnostics and might shed some light on this?

Thanks,
Bob
Click to expand...

Can you say 'anachronism'? ;)

Anyways, they were probably referring to Manichaenism, which Augustine believed before he became a Christian. According to scholars Mani taught dualism; an angry god vs. a loving god. Some believe that it is the source of which Augustine got his doctrine of original sin and double predestination. Calvin then simply picked up where he left off...

Look at this lovely and warm hearted endorsement of Calvinism:

http://www.biblelife.org/calvinism.htm
 
Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot
I would be curious to see what they are saying and where exactly they are coming from, but it sounds like complete garbage to me.

Calvinism and Gnosticism have nothing in common. The latter was refuted by the Apostles Creed, and all orthodox creeds since, particularly in the Westminster Confession. Gnosticism is a heresy and Calvinism is orthodoxy.
Click to expand...
Andrew,
I'll get you a link later. I just left the board after being totally amazed at the response I got to a post, and I can't bring myself to going back right now. It blew my mind.

I was responding to one of the quotes that one of the moderators was going to use in his book, which he felt was an example of how the early church was decisively Arminian. I tried to be as tactful and nonconfrontational as possible, but even that was to no avail.

Hopefully something I wrote might be useful to somebody over there some day.

[Edited on 5-1-2005 by blhowes]
 
Originally posted by poimen
Can you say 'anachronism'? ;)

Anyways, they were probably referring to Manichaenism, which Augustine believed before he became a Christian. According to scholars Mani taught dualism; an angry god vs. a loving god. Some believe that it is the source of which Augustine got his doctrine of original sin and double predestination. Calvin then simply picked up where he left off...

Look at this lovely and warm hearted endorsement of Calvinism:

http://www.biblelife.org/calvinism.htm
Click to expand...
Thanks for the link. It was nice to read some good, unbiased information about Calvin and his teachings once again. :lol:
 
Originally posted by blhowes
Ok, I ventured back to find the article on his website. Its called The Early Church and Calvinism.
Click to expand...

Hey Bob,

Your opponent is "self-appointed" and has no accountability to hold him to when he makes those sweeping, ignorant assumptions! The NT church upheld an order of checks/balances/authority-officers to test eachother's teachings. Paul even got Peter's approval when he came onboard....

Here is THE library for Early Christian writings:

http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/

Herein lies the C Fathers as well as Calvin's....

That Arminian pastor is completely unreliable; acting like a Jehovah Witness picking/choosing whatever to support his claims.

An irony is that the Church Fathers (more than less) got sucked into Gnosticism (not Calvinism!). The assumption that they wouldn't be martyred unless they had the truth is bogus....remember those guys flying the 911 planes? They were sure they had the truth.

If you care to keep tussling --- try (if you can) to get him to commit to the One argument: what is the Gospel ? and follow that thread from Paul on...Sadly, our Church Fathers got off-base so much...it's a wonder we made it this far! Still, the Gospel thread is there, unbroken.

These self-agrandized; self-appointed pastors that plant their own churches and have no one to answer to - are not Biblical (not a true Church) and are especially self-righteous --- hard to reach. Ideal cult-material. (This pastor is VERY Gnostic!) Trying to refute his own personal encounter with God is impossible to do. Notice, he tries to manipulate dissenters by accusing them of not reading his book - thus invalidating their counters or questions. Sounds like he is focused on book-sales - not obeying Scripture.

(Take two asparin and call me in the morning....:um:)

Robin
 
This brings to mind a good question....to all you (formally trained) theologians out there....

Which of the Fathers got it right? Which were off-base? (With respect to the Gospel/Justification.)

R.
 
Originally posted by Robin
Here is THE library for Early Christian writings:

http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/

Herein lies the C Fathers as well as Calvin's....
Click to expand...
Thanks. I'm sure that'll come in handy.

Originally posted by Robin
If you care to keep tussling --- try (if you can) to get him to commit to the One argument: what is the Gospel ? and follow that thread from Paul on...Sadly, our Church Fathers got off-base so much...it's a wonder we made it this far! Still, the Gospel thread is there, unbroken.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I had deleted the bookmark to that forum, thinking it was a real waste of time. I decided to go back and at least post a few more times and see what happens. Besides, I'm a little curious what other names he can come up with to call me.:lol:

Originally posted by Robin
Notice, he tries to manipulate dissenters by accusing them of not reading his book - thus invalidating their counters or questions.
Click to expand...
Yes, I've noticed that. Its a good (though irritating) tactic. In my last post, I tried in a nice way to tell him that nothing I've seen yet has sparked my interest in reading his book. I hope he doesn't get mad at me.
 
Bob,
You've obviously gotten under his skin. And someone needed to do that. His argumentation is nothing more than an extra-Biblical appeal to shore up a week theology.
 
Originally posted by LawrenceU
You've obviously gotten under his skin. And someone needed to do that. His argumentation is nothing more than an extra-Biblical appeal to shore up a week theology.
Click to expand...
I really didn't mean to get under his skin. I was kind of hoping he'd see that he's reading his Arminian theology into at least that one early church document by Barnabas. If this is the level of objectivity he uses in his research, I didn't have the heart to tell him that I wouldn't waste my time reading the rest of it (or, should I say, I'd have to really force myself to read more).
 
I surely didn't mean to imply that it was your motive! It just happened. Sometimes God will use that burr to move a man. You are doing a good job in that debate.

I, too, thought that Barnabas was actually pointing toward reformed thinking. Mr. Lyndon is showing a distinct bias.
 
Well, as long as we have the implications of our implicatory actions in place our assumptions will be astute.

Greg, you are right on that!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

A
  • Locked
Puritans and Calvinism
Replies
1
Views
2K
Staphlobob
Staphlobob
LadyFlynt
  • Locked
Baptist History and Calvinism
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
Ezekiel3626
Ezekiel3626
Justified
  • Locked
Martin Luther and The Five Points of Calvinism
Replies
2
Views
2K
Phil D.
Phil D.
DMcFadden
  • Locked
A "Softer" Calvinism???
Replies
29
Views
5K
DMcFadden
DMcFadden
A
  • Locked
The Emergence of Hyper-Calvinism
Replies
0
Views
2K
AV1611
A
Back
Top