Reformed Thomist
Puritan Board Sophomore
Should we say that what we call the soul is essentially separate from the body? Or is the soul so connected to the body that the soul and the body cannot be said to be separate 'substances'?
The line of questioning is important, theologically, because of the afterlife and the fact that the body is corruptible (it loses life). For instance, if we say that the soul and the body are not separate -- monism -- how can it be that the soul 'lives on' when the body dies? (There are, of course, theistic monist solutions to these problems, in particular, the Aristotelian-Thomistic: basically, it is the 'intellective' or rational aspect -- the uniquely human aspect -- of our soul that lives on when the 'vegetative' and 'sensitive' aspects -- the mere animal aspects of our soul -- are corrupted through natural death.)
If we take a dualist stance, however -- the immaterial soul, say, is the 'real me' and the body is just like the real me's accidental 'vehicle' -- how do we reconcile this with the real importance that Christianity places on the human body (the resurrection of the body, etc.)? According to the faith I cannot simply do away with the body as some dualists (Plato, Avicenna, Descartes) have done, for my body is at least a significant part of who I am.
Where ought we stand?
The line of questioning is important, theologically, because of the afterlife and the fact that the body is corruptible (it loses life). For instance, if we say that the soul and the body are not separate -- monism -- how can it be that the soul 'lives on' when the body dies? (There are, of course, theistic monist solutions to these problems, in particular, the Aristotelian-Thomistic: basically, it is the 'intellective' or rational aspect -- the uniquely human aspect -- of our soul that lives on when the 'vegetative' and 'sensitive' aspects -- the mere animal aspects of our soul -- are corrupted through natural death.)
If we take a dualist stance, however -- the immaterial soul, say, is the 'real me' and the body is just like the real me's accidental 'vehicle' -- how do we reconcile this with the real importance that Christianity places on the human body (the resurrection of the body, etc.)? According to the faith I cannot simply do away with the body as some dualists (Plato, Avicenna, Descartes) have done, for my body is at least a significant part of who I am.
Where ought we stand?