Confessor
Puritan Board Senior
Often, arguments against transubstantiation and consubstantiation include the fact that Christ is now residing at the right hand of God in heaven. Yet Luther posited that Christ was in/through/around the bread and wine and therefore posited the doctrine of Christ's ubiquity.
If ubiquity is denied in Reformed circles (primarily because it makes no sense to speak of a human body that is omnipresent), then how does Matthew 18:20 make sense?
"For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them."
Would it be Nestorian to say that Christ is with us divinely but not humanly?
If ubiquity is denied in Reformed circles (primarily because it makes no sense to speak of a human body that is omnipresent), then how does Matthew 18:20 make sense?
"For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them."
Would it be Nestorian to say that Christ is with us divinely but not humanly?