Durham in his lecture on Revelation 21:1 says the below. No edition corrected this but am I right that this should be anacoluthia (interruption) rather acoluthia (a companion)? Do I have the gist of the other two words correct?
This argument from the series and acoluthia [sic] of the prophecy, will bind the more strongly if we consider that there will hardly be found any such hysterosis [inversion] or hysterologia [last phrase first] in one and the same explicatory prophecy (such as this is), for though an explicatory prophecy may go back over events contained in a principal prophecy, yet that in one and the same explicatory prophecy, there is such retrogressing over one event to set down some other wholly antecedaneous [previous] to it, and having no connection with anything successive unto it, as this would be if it did belong to a state of the church before the final sentencing of the wicked mentioned in the close of the former chapter, will not be easily found.