What's Up With the Presbyterians?

Status
Not open for further replies.

refbaptdude

Puritan Board Freshman
I use to think that Baptists lead the way in church or denominational splits, but lately I think the Presbyterians are speeding past the Baptists. It seems that weekly you hear of a new presbytery forming because of . . . . .

When I read their websites it seems a number of these new smaller presbyteries have alot in common.

Just an observation,
Steve
 
Originally posted by refbaptdude
I use to think that Baptists lead the way in church or denominational splits, but lately I think the Presbyterians are speeding past the Baptists. It seems that weekly you hear of a new presbytery forming because of . . . . .

When I read their websites it seems a number of these new smaller presbyteries have alot in common.

Just an observation,
Steve
Well, when you tell us what's up with the Baptists, we'll tell you what's up with the Presbyterians.

Just another observation,
DTK
 
Well, when you tell us what's up with the Baptists, we'll tell you what's up with the Presbyterians.

Responses like the quote above is why people have been leaving the board. Why do people have be jerks on the board?

The intention of my post was not to be sarcastic, it was to be an honest observation that I thought some of my Presbyterian brothers my have some insight that I am unaware.

Baptist split in my opinion because of a hyper individualistic democratic mentality.

[Edited on 11-28-2005 by refbaptdude]
 
Originally posted by wsw201
Baptist split in my opinion because of a hyper individualistic democratic mentality.

That about covers it for the Presbyterians! (and I am serious).

That and the weird diverse thoughts some call theology and the pursuit of purity in doctrine....or lack thereof.
 
That about covers it for the Presbyterians! (and I am serious).

Interesting!

This seems to be a growing problem for the church in America. I have noticed how even American Roman Catholics reject any kind of ecclesiastical authority. American RC´s are quick to spew at their church.

[Edited on 11-28-2005 by refbaptdude]
 
Originally posted by refbaptdude
Well, when you tell us what's up with the Baptists, we'll tell you what's up with the Presbyterians.

Responses like the quote above is why people have been leaving the board. Why do people have be jerks on the board?

The intention of my post was not to be sarcastic, it was to be an honest observation that I thought some of my Presbyterian brothers my have some insight that I am unaware.

Baptist split in my opinion because of a hyper individualistic democratic mentality.

[Edited on 11-28-2005 by refbaptdude]
My brother,

I think you ought to stop and reflect over your own comments. You seem to be operating with a double standard here. I don't think that makes me a jerk, any more than your original question makes you a jerk. Think about it.

Now, then, Presbyterians split, in my opinion, for the same reason that Baptists do it, because of a hyper individualistic mentality. The sin, my brother, sadly, is one common to all, and that was the point of my original post. It was to suggest to you that Presbyterians can be just as guilty of the same sin as Baptists, and for the same reasons. Our polity, though helpful, is no more assurance against the sin of schism than the polity of Baptists.

DTK
 
Originally posted by wsw201
Baptist split in my opinion because of a hyper individualistic democratic mentality.

That about covers it for the Presbyterians! (and I am serious).

:ditto: Steve, I think Pastor King meant much more by his post than pure sarcasm, although I see how it could have been perceived that way. As Wayne noted above, a lot of the issues that cause schisms are really the same at heart between both camps (hence, the answer for the Baptists will automatically tell a lot about the similar issue for Presbyterians).

In any case, Presbyterian churches tend to split over RPW issues, strictness of officers' required confessional sucscription, and often merely historical or cultural differences. For instance, while many Presbyterian micro-denominations are separated over issues like worship and subscription, churches like the PCA and OPC are virtually identical regarding those issues, but were initially formed in different contexts ( e.g. Northern vs. Southern Presbyterian Church), and have never quite seen it as enough of a necessity to unite despite their commonalities.

Furthermore, even a number of those Presbyterian churches that split over issues like worship and subscription often either misunderstand, ignore, abuse or underestimate the importance of unity in the visible Church and the sinful nature of schism. And that key problem indeed reflects a "hyper individualistic democratic mentality," possibly just as much as do the cultural and historical separations.
 
If the views expressed on this Board are any indication, I'd say a HUGE reason for all the schisms among Presbyterians is because of arrogant inflexibility regarding various matters pertaining to worship.
All too often I read remarks that indicate that the position held by person A is truly faithful to the 2nd Commandment, with the implication being that others are violating that moral law. Is there any wonder why churches break off fellowship from others when they believe that others are in sin for not worshipping as they?
The problem, in my opinion, is the elevation of one's worship preferences to the status of "faithful application of the moral law" while other views are derided as sinful. Such arrogance leads to schism, though the schismatics attempt to divert the attention from their sinfulness by saying that they are simply separating themselves from those who don't engage in "true" or "pure" worship.
 
Originally posted by SolaScriptura
If the views expressed on this Board are any indication, I'd say a HUGE reason for all the schisms among Presbyterians is because of arrogant inflexibility regarding various matters pertaining to worship.
All too often I read remarks that indicate that the position held by person A is truly faithful to the 2nd Commandment, with the implication being that others are violating that moral law. Is there any wonder why churches break off fellowship from others when they believe that others are in sin for not worshipping as they?
The problem, in my opinion, is the elevation of one's worship preferences to the status of "faithful application of the moral law" while other views are derided as sinful. Such arrogance leads to schism, though the schismatics attempt to divert the attention from their sinfulness by saying that they are simply separating themselves from those who don't engage in "true" or "pure" worship.

Ben,

I'd like to mildly disagree, while affirming your basic frustration. Why is that? Because Calvin was exceedingly zealous for the pure worship of God, and yet he desired unity with Luther and the other Reformers, not separation. The Puritans railed against the excesses of the Anglican church, and yet remained in its communion until literally thrown out ("ejected") in 1662.

Desiring pure worship, and being strict in one's view of worship is not wrong. It is also not necessarily an unbiblical binding of conscience or elevation of mere preference. But it is shocking - to me at least - how quickly the Presbyterian Church has become fragmented, and even more so how many small denominations do not have union while they agree on 99.99% of Reformed distinctives (i.e. EP, RPW, etc)
 
Originally posted by fredtgreco
Originally posted by SolaScriptura
If the views expressed on this Board are any indication, I'd say a HUGE reason for all the schisms among Presbyterians is because of arrogant inflexibility regarding various matters pertaining to worship.
All too often I read remarks that indicate that the position held by person A is truly faithful to the 2nd Commandment, with the implication being that others are violating that moral law. Is there any wonder why churches break off fellowship from others when they believe that others are in sin for not worshipping as they?
The problem, in my opinion, is the elevation of one's worship preferences to the status of "faithful application of the moral law" while other views are derided as sinful. Such arrogance leads to schism, though the schismatics attempt to divert the attention from their sinfulness by saying that they are simply separating themselves from those who don't engage in "true" or "pure" worship.

Ben,

I'd like to mildly disagree, while affirming your basic frustration. Why is that? Because Calvin was exceedingly zealous for the pure worship of God, and yet he desired unity with Luther and the other Reformers, not separation. The Puritans railed against the excesses of the Anglican church, and yet remained in its communion until literally thrown out ("ejected") in 1662.

Desiring pure worship, and being strict in one's view of worship is not wrong. It is also not necessarily an unbiblical binding of conscience or elevation of mere preference. But it is shocking - to me at least - how quickly the Presbyterian Church has become fragmented, and even more so how many small denominations do not have union while they agree on 99.99% of Reformed distinctives (i.e. EP, RPW, etc)

In fact, this is exactly the type of worshippers Christ is seeking:

John 4:23-24 23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Based upon this, we all should be 'zealous' for the purest form of worship we are able to underrstand and muster.

I believe Ben is more concerned with the dogmatism that arises out of the zeal for the purity, which ultimately can lead to division.

[Edited on 11-29-2005 by PAIN IN THE NECK]
 
Originally posted by PAIN IN THE NECK
Originally posted by fredtgreco
Originally posted by SolaScriptura
If the views expressed on this Board are any indication, I'd say a HUGE reason for all the schisms among Presbyterians is because of arrogant inflexibility regarding various matters pertaining to worship.
All too often I read remarks that indicate that the position held by person A is truly faithful to the 2nd Commandment, with the implication being that others are violating that moral law. Is there any wonder why churches break off fellowship from others when they believe that others are in sin for not worshipping as they?
The problem, in my opinion, is the elevation of one's worship preferences to the status of "faithful application of the moral law" while other views are derided as sinful. Such arrogance leads to schism, though the schismatics attempt to divert the attention from their sinfulness by saying that they are simply separating themselves from those who don't engage in "true" or "pure" worship.

Ben,

I'd like to mildly disagree, while affirming your basic frustration. Why is that? Because Calvin was exceedingly zealous for the pure worship of God, and yet he desired unity with Luther and the other Reformers, not separation. The Puritans railed against the excesses of the Anglican church, and yet remained in its communion until literally thrown out ("ejected") in 1662.

Desiring pure worship, and being strict in one's view of worship is not wrong. It is also not necessarily an unbiblical binding of conscience or elevation of mere preference. But it is shocking - to me at least - how quickly the Presbyterian Church has become fragmented, and even more so how many small denominations do not have union while they agree on 99.99% of Reformed distinctives (i.e. EP, RPW, etc)

In fact, this is exactly the type of worshippers Christ is seeking:

John 4:23-24 23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

God does seek those who desire true worship. But He also desires no less that they should be one:

John 17:11 "Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are

John 17:22 And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one

Psalm 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is For brethren to dwell together in unity!

Ephesians 4:1-16 I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, 2 with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love, 3 endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. 4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. 7 But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ's gift. 8 Therefore He says: "When He ascended on high, He led captivity captive, And gave gifts to men." 9 (Now this, "He ascended" -- what does it mean but that He also first descended into the lower parts of the earth? 10 He who descended is also the One who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things.) 11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head -- Christ -- 16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.

As I said, the key for me is standing firmly on convictions, while willing to see the greater unity of God's Church.

[Edited on 11/29/2005 by fredtgreco]
 
Originally posted by SolaScriptura
If the views expressed on this Board are any indication, I'd say a HUGE reason for all the schisms among Presbyterians is because of arrogant inflexibility regarding various matters pertaining to worship.
All too often I read remarks that indicate that the position held by person A is truly faithful to the 2nd Commandment, with the implication being that others are violating that moral law. Is there any wonder why churches break off fellowship from others when they believe that others are in sin for not worshipping as they?
The problem, in my opinion, is the elevation of one's worship preferences to the status of "faithful application of the moral law" while other views are derided as sinful. Such arrogance leads to schism, though the schismatics attempt to divert the attention from their sinfulness by saying that they are simply separating themselves from those who don't engage in "true" or "pure" worship.

Ditto, liberal churchmen began imposing the doctrines of men upon tender consciences captive to the word of God. The lesser part, the offended party, were the ones that separated but the majority were the schismatics because they arrogantly usurped Christ as the lawgiver in his church and inflexibly refused to submit to his worship.
 
Originally posted by fredtgreco
God does seek those who desire true worship. But He also desires no less that they should be one:

John 17:11 "Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are

John 17:22 And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one

Psalm 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is For brethren to dwell together in unity!

Ephesians 4:1-16 I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, 2 with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love, 3 endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. 4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. 7 But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ's gift. 8 Therefore He says: "When He ascended on high, He led captivity captive, And gave gifts to men." 9 (Now this, "He ascended" -- what does it mean but that He also first descended into the lower parts of the earth? 10 He who descended is also the One who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things.) 11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head -- Christ -- 16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.

As I said, the key for me is standing firmly on convictions, while willing to see the greater unity of God's Church.

[Edited on 11/29/2005 by fredtgreco]
:up: Right on.

If the Church could stay united while Athanasius was disputing with Arius then I think we can work out some of our issues together as well. I just don't think many of us have the patience for something to resolve itself over a few decades. Especially with the Internet now and "virtual anathemas" we're far too quick to separate ourselves.

[Edited on 11-29-2005 by SemperFideles]
 
Originally posted by fredtgreco
Originally posted by PAIN IN THE NECK
Originally posted by fredtgreco
Originally posted by SolaScriptura
If the views expressed on this Board are any indication, I'd say a HUGE reason for all the schisms among Presbyterians is because of arrogant inflexibility regarding various matters pertaining to worship.
All too often I read remarks that indicate that the position held by person A is truly faithful to the 2nd Commandment, with the implication being that others are violating that moral law. Is there any wonder why churches break off fellowship from others when they believe that others are in sin for not worshipping as they?
The problem, in my opinion, is the elevation of one's worship preferences to the status of "faithful application of the moral law" while other views are derided as sinful. Such arrogance leads to schism, though the schismatics attempt to divert the attention from their sinfulness by saying that they are simply separating themselves from those who don't engage in "true" or "pure" worship.

Ben,

I'd like to mildly disagree, while affirming your basic frustration. Why is that? Because Calvin was exceedingly zealous for the pure worship of God, and yet he desired unity with Luther and the other Reformers, not separation. The Puritans railed against the excesses of the Anglican church, and yet remained in its communion until literally thrown out ("ejected") in 1662.

Desiring pure worship, and being strict in one's view of worship is not wrong. It is also not necessarily an unbiblical binding of conscience or elevation of mere preference. But it is shocking - to me at least - how quickly the Presbyterian Church has become fragmented, and even more so how many small denominations do not have union while they agree on 99.99% of Reformed distinctives (i.e. EP, RPW, etc)

In fact, this is exactly the type of worshippers Christ is seeking:

John 4:23-24 23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

God does seek those who desire true worship. But He also desires no less that they should be one:

John 17:11 "Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are

John 17:22 And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one

Psalm 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is For brethren to dwell together in unity!

Ephesians 4:1-16 I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, 2 with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love, 3 endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. 4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. 7 But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ's gift. 8 Therefore He says: "When He ascended on high, He led captivity captive, And gave gifts to men." 9 (Now this, "He ascended" -- what does it mean but that He also first descended into the lower parts of the earth? 10 He who descended is also the One who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things.) 11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head -- Christ -- 16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.

As I said, the key for me is standing firmly on convictions, while willing to see the greater unity of God's Church.

[Edited on 11/29/2005 by fredtgreco]

Fred,
I agree with what you have stated. In fact, that is why I said:

I believe Ben is more concerned with the dogmatism that arises out of the zeal for the purity, which ultimately can lead to division.

If my post didn't clearify that, forgive me. I do not believe the unity of the brethren should be compromised over such issues.

You mention 'greater unity'. This should be our goal. In Heaven, we will have complete, perfect unity. The imperfect unity that we have presently are the essentials of the faith which is the most important component. This is the glue that binds us together. These secondary issues, though they may seem divisive, are really not.

Amen?
 
:amen:
I didn't mean to imply, by the way, that you were being a pain in the neck...I was replying to Fred.

[Edited on 11-29-2005 by SemperFideles]
 
yes2bb.gif
to both of you.
 
Thinking in light of the examples of Calvin with Luther and the Puritans with the Church of England, what implications do they have for the specifics we face today, particularly in light of the different (lesser) level of unity the visible Church has in our day versus theirs? In other words, how would we go about setting the "standard" for working towards a biblical balance between the two extremes of 1) the mass micro-schisms we see today within the Reformed (and non-Reformed) parts of the visible Church, and 2) a hyper-ecumenism that would immediately unite Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists, Reformed and Presbyterians into one ecclesiastical denomination, dealing with their doctrinal disagreements (on non-salvific matters such as worship, sacramentology and election) solely as internal issues?
 
Exactly my question Chris.

Also, what kind of unity is the Bible speaking of in the verses above (honest question)? Is it to "see how many christians we can fit under one roof?" or is it to be like MINDED?

1Co 1:10 Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.
1Co 1:11 For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe's household, that there are contentions among you.
1Co 1:12 Now I say this, that each of you says, "I am of Paul," or "I am of Apollos," or "I am of Cephas," or "I am of Christ."
1Co 1:13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?


Geneva Study Bible

Joh 17:11 - And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be (c) one, as we [are].

(c) He prays that his people may peaceably agree and be joined together in one, that as the Godhead is one, so they may be of one mind and one consent together.

Eph 4:3 - (3) Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

(3) Thirdly he requires perfect agreement, but yet such that is joined with the band of the Holy Spirit.
 
Originally posted by fredtgreco
Ben,

I'd like to mildly disagree, while affirming your basic frustration. Why is that? Because Calvin was exceedingly zealous for the pure worship of God, and yet he desired unity with Luther and the other Reformers, not separation. The Puritans railed against the excesses of the Anglican church, and yet remained in its communion until literally thrown out ("ejected") in 1662.

Desiring pure worship, and being strict in one's view of worship is not wrong. It is also not necessarily an unbiblical binding of conscience or elevation of mere preference. But it is shocking - to me at least - how quickly the Presbyterian Church has become fragmented, and even more so how many small denominations do not have union while they agree on 99.99% of Reformed distinctives (i.e. EP, RPW, etc)

Fred,
Well... since I agree 100% with what you wrote, I believe that you don't disagree with me... I must not have communicated very clearly.

I believe Ben is more concerned with the dogmatism that arises out of the zeal for the purity, which ultimately can lead to division.

Exactly.
 
[time-out on the thread's topic]
Just a light-hearted, quasi-serious-humorous observation: In many different beneficial discussions, I've recently noticed Fred and Ben implicitly playing the same 99.XYZ percentage game that Fred and Paul Manata used to play explicitly!
[/time-in]
 
Originally posted by Me Died Blue
[time-out on the thread's topic]
Just a light-hearted, quasi-serious-humorous observation: In many different beneficial discussions, I've recently noticed Fred and Ben implicitly playing the same 99.XYZ percentage game that Fred and Paul Manata used to play explicitly!
[/time-in]

I don't get it.
Can we help it if we're both ridiculously smart and amazingly handsome?

[Edited on 11-29-2005 by SolaScriptura]
 
Originally posted by Me Died Blue
Thinking in light of the examples of Calvin with Luther and the Puritans with the Church of England, what implications do they have for the specifics we face today, particularly in light of the different (lesser) level of unity the visible Church has in our day versus theirs? In other words, how would we go about setting the "standard" for working towards a biblical balance between the two extremes of 1) the mass micro-schisms we see today within the Reformed (and non-Reformed) parts of the visible Church, and 2) a hyper-ecumenism that would immediately unite Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists, Reformed and Presbyterians into one ecclesiastical denomination, dealing with their doctrinal disagreements (on non-salvific matters such as worship, sacramentology and election) solely as internal issues?

Chris,

A very simple place to start would be for union of denominations with the exact same Confessional Standards. That would mean the OPC and the PCA. It would also mean about a couple of dozen micro-denominations (most of which have less than a dozen churches) that all espouse the 1646 WCF.

After that point, it would make sense for the various WCF denominations to see if it is possible to unite over lesser differences - e.g. such that Calvin, the Reformers and the Puritans were willing to unite over.

After that, it would also make sense to see if like Reformed denominations could unite (e.g. the 3FU denominations and the WCF denominations).

After all that work, such a united church would still comprose but a small portion of the visible Church. But it would be significant. I also believe that if such were to happen (by the grace of God), that real reform would come to the Church. The problem now, in my opinion is not that the Church is theologically errant (she is) but that she is irrelevant. I don't mean relevant to the world, but that she is not the force to be reckoned with that she should be.
 
Originally posted by SolaScriptura
Originally posted by Me Died Blue
[time-out on the thread's topic]
Just a light-hearted, quasi-serious-humorous observation: In many different beneficial discussions, I've recently noticed Fred and Ben implicitly playing the same 99.XYZ percentage game that Fred and Paul Manata used to play explicitly!
[/time-in]

I don't get it.
Can we help it if we're both ridiculously smart and amazingly handsome?

[Edited on 11-29-2005 by SolaScriptura]

thumbsup.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top