christianyouth
Puritan Board Senior
What does Reformed Evangelism look like and how does it differ from the evangelism of the Non-Reformed Christian community?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does Reformed Evangelism look like and how does it differ from the evangelism of the Non-Reformed Christian community?
Sorry brothers.......
But one "mark" of Reformed evangelism, sadly is that most of the effort that is put into it is telling about how others do it all wrong....
...and not enough effort is put into "just doin' it".
"What is Reformed Evangelism"...hmmmmmm, I don't know - but I sure know it isn't this, this and this.....
There is a place for critique, but test this hypothesis: Google or look up "Reformed" and "Evangelism" together and 80% of what you will get is a bunch of bookish calvinists critcizing well-meant-but-substandard Arminian efforts.
Reformed evangelism is:
Energetic: Look at the efforts of the Puritans,
Wellgrounded in truth: Puritan theology
Bold: That Scottish Reformation guy (Knox) standing up to the Queen
It in INNOVATIVE: Carey called for voluntary associations (gasp..the first promoter of the parachurch) and Judson dressed and taught in the manner of a Buddhist monk,
It tracks people and numbers and quantifies: Mc"Cheyne had a map of everyone in his village and he charted who was open, closed indifferent to the Gospel and he prayed systematically for every person in his village yearly,
It is "ecumenical": Jonathan Edwards preached in many pulpits and called for a regular season of fasting and praying for Christians of all stripes.
Sorry brothers.......
But one "mark" of Reformed evangelism, sadly is that most of the effort that is put into it is telling about how others do it all wrong....
...and not enough effort is put into "just doin' it".
"What is Reformed Evangelism"...hmmmmmm, I don't know - but I sure know it isn't this, this and this.....
There is a place for critique, but test this hypothesis: Google or look up "Reformed" and "Evangelism" together and 80% of what you will get is a bunch of bookish calvinists critcizing well-meant-but-substandard Arminian efforts.
Reformed evangelism is:
Energetic: Look at the efforts of the Puritans,
Wellgrounded in truth: Puritan theology
Bold: That Scottish Reformation guy (Knox) standing up to the Queen
It in INNOVATIVE: Carey called for voluntary associations (gasp..the first promoter of the parachurch) and Judson dressed and taught in the manner of a Buddhist monk,
It tracks people and numbers and quantifies: Mc"Cheyne had a map of everyone in his village and he charted who was open, closed indifferent to the Gospel and he prayed systematically for every person in his village yearly,
It is "ecumenical": Jonathan Edwards preached in many pulpits and called for a regular season of fasting and praying for Christians of all stripes.
so glad you wouldn't fall into the same trap of telling what is wrong with the way one side does it
Ha, touche!
Everyone's a critic....including me!
What does Reformed Evangelism look like and how does it differ from the evangelism of the Non-Reformed Christian community?
In a nut shell..
Reformed Evangelism
We are sinners and we are justified only by God's grace through faith in Christ and His work (Rom 3:23-16).
Therefore, we must "repent and believe in the gospel" (Mk 1:15)
Non-Reformed Evangelism
Say this prayer after me...
My Lord and my God, have mercy upon my soul, a sinner.
I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of the Living God and that He died on the cross and shed His blood for the forgiveness of my sins.
I believe Jesus rose again from the dead by the power of the Holy Ghost and sits on the right hand of God.
Come into my heart, Lord Jesus, and wash all my sins away with Your blood.
I invite you into my heart as my personal Savior, and will follow you the rest of my life.
Thank you, Jesus, for saving my soul. Amen.
when one is unsure of their salvation...
Reformed response: "examine yourself by the Scriptures and see if you are in the faith" (from 2 Cor 13:5)
Other response: "did you say the sinners prayer?"
The ideal is NOT to have a one-shot-deal or a limited number of time in which you feel you must think of something extra ear-catching to say. The ideal is to intentionally and regularly engage unbeleivers in a sustained fashion. Then they can really see fruit instead of cheap talk.
Let me ask this...
How would you witness to an unbeliever knowing you only had a limited amount of time and then you would never see them again? Let's say it's on an airplane.
I've been pondering this, mostly how I would avoid popular catch phrases like "God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life" or "Jesus died for your sins". What would the Reformed presentation look like?
The ideal is NOT to have a one-shot-deal or a limited number of time in which you feel you must think of something extra ear-catching to say. The ideal is to intentionally and regularly engage unbeleivers in a sustained fashion. Then they can really see fruit instead of cheap talk.
Sorry for using the airplane example. I agree with you of course about regularly engageing people in a sustained fashion as being ideal. What if this is not possible? Is there anyway to evangelize in a limited amount of time, or do only Arminians have a corner on this?
Dr. Gerstner's five s's of evangelism (following the Puritan methodology)
1) SILENCE (this is the liberal approach, they have no Gospel)
2) SACRAMENTALISM (it may be argued that most people identifying themselves as Christians are working under this approach)
3) SURRENDER (the typical modern day evangelical approach. Persuade the sinner to give up his sinful ways and (in and of his own strength) to come to Christ)
4 SHRUG (A person approaches a Calvinistic minister and says, "what must I do to be saved?". The minister replies:
"'Believe on the Lord Jesus and you will be saved'". The man replies, 'Pastor, I've been sitting under your preaching for 20 years. And if I understand the Bible through what you are teaching, unless God opens my heart I never will believe. Now, Pastor, please, I ask you, what do I do?"................The Pastor Shrugs)
5) SEEKING (Exhort the person to seek God. That is, he should place hismself in an environment where the Gospel is set forth (Church, Christian friends, etc). He should not claim a faith he does not have. He should observe the outward observance/duties of what God commands. This way, if he does end up going to hell, he'll make the number of his sins one less. If every word comes into the judgment, the less sins the better). In all probability, God will be merciful. But not necessarily. Esau is set forth as a solemn example of a man who sought repentance with ters, but could not find it
Let me ask this...
How would you witness to an unbeliever knowing you only had a limited amount of time and then you would never see them again? Let's say it's on an airplane.
I've been pondering this, mostly how I would avoid popular catch phrases like "God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life" or "Jesus died for your sins". What would the Reformed presentation look like?
Let me ask this...
How would you witness to an unbeliever knowing you only had a limited amount of time and then you would never see them again? Let's say it's on an airplane.
I've been pondering this, mostly how I would avoid popular catch phrases like "God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life" or "Jesus died for your sins". What would the Reformed presentation look like?
Rick - that's a great question because it gets at the heart of the evangelism discussion. There are some Reformed believers who would never "witness" - share their faith in Christ - in that context. They hold to the view that the only valid evangelism is the proclamation of the word of God by an ordained minister of the gospel. Since that usually happens from the pulpit, evangelism becomes pulpit driven. To get around this view the same people will validate the evangelism efforts of missionaries because they are ordained and sent by local churches.
Dieter et al:
My posts above were proven correct by your link.
Of all the resources you linked, the majority are but reactionary diatribes against "modern evangelism,", i.e. negative reactions and criticisms of the efforts of others.
Few focus on positive advice about evanglism.
We are a reactionary bunch and our articles on evangelism usually merely consist of "This is what evangleism is not...it is not this..it isnot this..."
Well...what IS it