I would like to add one Bible-order reflection to this thread, or perhaps better put, an apostolic order.
Consider the gospel pattern of the book of Romans. The overall order of the book is: 1) the bad news, 2) the good news, 3) implications of the good news. This has every appearance of gospel- or salvation-priority.
Drilling down, yet we find there are other priorities, some of which come before others in logic or time, which thus may be said to be properly more significant.
Consider the place of election. Paul does not start with election; but when he gets to it, clearly it is essential, even fundamental to the gospel. Paul's basic gospel investigation is like walking into a grand house for sale, and having the real estate agent point out all the fantastic things right from the front door. The centerpiece of the house--it's reason for existence we could say--is a focal gathering point for family/friends, everything seems to be oriented thence and for the comfort of those present. At some point, the agent invites the visitors into the cellar, and there he points to the signs of a firm foundation to this edifice. This house is built on a rock, and without that security none of the above amenities would stand firm.
So, the purposes designed for them who came in the front door and who spend all their time on the upper levels--are these of "more importance" than the foundation? In one sense, yes. But in another vital sense the doctrine of election does have a kind of "priority." In his letter, Paul hints at other hidden priorities, such as the doctrine of One True God versus all the wrong ideas about God to which the Gentiles are committed. There's a sense in which he can begin his gospel presentation, as he did in Athens, not by directly challenging the foolishness of idolatry and polytheism, but by proclaiming the God of gods, the Living God, who is bound to bring everything into judgment.
It is this God--and no other, for there is no other--which is responsible not only for the world's existence, but also for its redemption if it is to be redeemed. Persisting in false conception of who this God is will invariably result--if not in one generation, then in the next--in loss of the gospel entire, for which the One True God is the author. Jupiter cannot be plugged into the divine concept of Romans 1-2, let alone the God of our salvation who is behind the whole letter to Rome. Neither can the god of the Arians, or the Pelagians fulfill the hope of believers in some form of salvation from on high. If one speaks of "God" and "Christ," but has turned like Marcion to a two-fold conception of the God(s) of OT/NT revelation, he does not really understand God or Christ. And lacking real knowledge of God-in-Christ, all these continue to be lost even when they think themselves found and safe.
I suspect Trueman would gladly say he believes in a "salvation priority," in the Book of Romans sense. I think he can say this in all honesty, even while he urgently points to a different kind of priority concerning Who God Is. The early church desperately saw the importance of "getting God right," which concern nowadays large portions of the church seem amazingly indifferent to. Still, there are people who agree now on the importance of the right foundation, but who try to build vastly different superstructures on it. We are arguing with them about which blueprint is correct, and biblical.
We are arguing with the indifferent others about blueprints as well, as they claim to be building what we are building, with the front door in the same place and a very similar layout; all the while they ignore the foundation.
Consider the gospel pattern of the book of Romans. The overall order of the book is: 1) the bad news, 2) the good news, 3) implications of the good news. This has every appearance of gospel- or salvation-priority.
Drilling down, yet we find there are other priorities, some of which come before others in logic or time, which thus may be said to be properly more significant.
Consider the place of election. Paul does not start with election; but when he gets to it, clearly it is essential, even fundamental to the gospel. Paul's basic gospel investigation is like walking into a grand house for sale, and having the real estate agent point out all the fantastic things right from the front door. The centerpiece of the house--it's reason for existence we could say--is a focal gathering point for family/friends, everything seems to be oriented thence and for the comfort of those present. At some point, the agent invites the visitors into the cellar, and there he points to the signs of a firm foundation to this edifice. This house is built on a rock, and without that security none of the above amenities would stand firm.
So, the purposes designed for them who came in the front door and who spend all their time on the upper levels--are these of "more importance" than the foundation? In one sense, yes. But in another vital sense the doctrine of election does have a kind of "priority." In his letter, Paul hints at other hidden priorities, such as the doctrine of One True God versus all the wrong ideas about God to which the Gentiles are committed. There's a sense in which he can begin his gospel presentation, as he did in Athens, not by directly challenging the foolishness of idolatry and polytheism, but by proclaiming the God of gods, the Living God, who is bound to bring everything into judgment.
It is this God--and no other, for there is no other--which is responsible not only for the world's existence, but also for its redemption if it is to be redeemed. Persisting in false conception of who this God is will invariably result--if not in one generation, then in the next--in loss of the gospel entire, for which the One True God is the author. Jupiter cannot be plugged into the divine concept of Romans 1-2, let alone the God of our salvation who is behind the whole letter to Rome. Neither can the god of the Arians, or the Pelagians fulfill the hope of believers in some form of salvation from on high. If one speaks of "God" and "Christ," but has turned like Marcion to a two-fold conception of the God(s) of OT/NT revelation, he does not really understand God or Christ. And lacking real knowledge of God-in-Christ, all these continue to be lost even when they think themselves found and safe.
I suspect Trueman would gladly say he believes in a "salvation priority," in the Book of Romans sense. I think he can say this in all honesty, even while he urgently points to a different kind of priority concerning Who God Is. The early church desperately saw the importance of "getting God right," which concern nowadays large portions of the church seem amazingly indifferent to. Still, there are people who agree now on the importance of the right foundation, but who try to build vastly different superstructures on it. We are arguing with them about which blueprint is correct, and biblical.
We are arguing with the indifferent others about blueprints as well, as they claim to be building what we are building, with the front door in the same place and a very similar layout; all the while they ignore the foundation.