Is what Pat Robertson said correct?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Claudiu

Puritan Board Junior
I meant to post this yesterday when I saw it on a twitter post (now its on the Yahoo! from page). Anyways, is what Pat Robertson said correct?

Here's the video (comment is made at 0:30):
[video=youtube;f5TE99sAbwM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5TE99sAbwM[/video]
 
Pat Robertson is a fool and an embarrassment to the church. It's a pity he has as large an audience as he does.
 
I was under the impression that we (the whole world) are all under a curse.

And to Adam he said, "Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, 'You shall not eat of it,'cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life; thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return." - Gen 3:17-19

I know I certainly am deserving of punishment and destruction. It's only by His grace and mercy that my home isn't ravaged by earthquakes or any other calamity.
 
Pat Robertson is a fool and an embarrassment to the church. It's a pity he has as large an audience as he does.

Am I seeing a trend with Yale Law grads? Or is it the New York Theological Seminary degree? Maybe it is his SBC ordination?

I'm voting for failed prophecies:

* Robertson predicted that the end of the world was coming in November or October 1982.
* In May 2006, Robertson declared that storms and possibly a tsunami would hit America's coastline sometime in 2006.
* On the January 2, 2007 broadcast of The 700 Club, Robertson said that God spoke to him and told him that "mass killings" were to come during 2007, due to a terrorist attack on the United States
* In October 2008 he said that "we have between 75 and 120 days before the Middle East starts spinning out of control."

Still in January of 20089 he did predict that a recession would occur in the United States that would be followed by a stock market crash by 2010.
 
My favorite is his supporting China's one child per family law, which had nothing to do with his financial interests there, but only to his deep commitment to covenant theology.
 
I thought it was a pitiful summary. Jesus made a comment about Galileans & some people a tower fell on. It would be wise if Pat read Luke 13:1-5 and meditated on that passage.
 
Pat Robertson is a fool and an embarrassment to the church. It's a pity he has as large an audience as he does.

Am I seeing a trend with Yale Law grads? Or is it the New York Theological Seminary degree? Maybe it is his SBC ordination?

I'm voting for failed prophecies:

* Robertson predicted that the end of the world was coming in November or October 1982.
* In May 2006, Robertson declared that storms and possibly a tsunami would hit America's coastline sometime in 2006.
* On the January 2, 2007 broadcast of The 700 Club, Robertson said that God spoke to him and told him that "mass killings" were to come during 2007, due to a terrorist attack on the United States
* In October 2008 he said that "we have between 75 and 120 days before the Middle East starts spinning out of control."

Still in January of 20089 he did predict that a recession would occur in the United States that would be followed by a stock market crash by 2010.
Evan on the last point he is wrong, a Market correction is a better term, and while a few little bumps are around, most agree: Including Warren Buffet who putting money where his mouth is is swinging major Capitol into the Market!:2cents:
 
My favorite is his supporting China's one child per family law, which had nothing to do with his financial interests there, but only to his deep commitment to covenant theology.

Forced abortion = ok? Pat Robertson is a complete raving moonbat. And he glorifies atheists really well. :barfy:
 
I don't have a problem with his statement. Righteousness exalts a nation, always has and always will. Now I do not know the history of Dominican Republic vs. Haiti so I don't know how accurate his contrast is. Pointing out that evil things happen to good Christians does not refute the point. Even looking at Israel, there were good folks when Israel was defeated and enslaved etc. Bad things happening can be a blessing in disguise if people use the situation to evaluate their lives and turn to God.

Also the opening question is whether or not Pat is correct on this topic, not whether or not he was wrong on 36 of the last 35 things he has said.
 
Hermonta, it's my opinion that he's implying that the Haiti disaster is a result of this "pact" that Haiti made with the devil while under French rule. The devil doesn't cut deals, and I'd like to know how Pat was privy to such a conversation anyway.

I think it is more charitable and more reasonable to take it that the disaster is a result of "their living up to their end of the deal". If it was all in the hands of Satan then why leave the possibility open to revival and saner days ahead. It also seems that he is referring to some relatively open secret about why witchcraft etc is so prevalent there. As I said, my history of that region is not comprehensive but such a turn of events I find plausible.
 
Who cares? He's so full of nonsense. Seems ole Pat thinks the devil's got authority to bargain over souls. :um: If I were an unbeliever and thought Pat Robertson was an accurate representative of what Christianity taught, I'd never become one. Praise God, though, he's not.

Unfortunately many non-Christians do look at him as an accurate representation of what Christianity teaches.
 
Hermonta, it's my opinion that he's implying that the Haiti disaster is a result of this "pact" that Haiti made with the devil while under French rule. The devil doesn't cut deals, and I'd like to know how Pat was privy to such a conversation anyway.

Thats what I was trying to figure out, if Haiti did make a deal with the devil?
 
You make a pact with the devil every time you tolerate a corrupt official, let your daughter sleep around, don't give to the church, cheat your neighbor, hire a witch to hex an enemy and take God's name in vain. You don't have to be a theonomist to see a correlation between cultures that practice a higher level of morality and cultures that have more money, and better building codes. Quakes, droughts and plagues have greater impacts on countries with lower standards of morality. It's a no brainer, at least for anyone who's followed history (or the news). Lack of rains in Somalia have a different effect than lack of rains in California, and even in Nevada drug lords can't murder state officials at will and without consequences.

I just hope people keep in mind that we're not as moral as many of us think, and remember that as Christians we have obligations to Christianize society.
 
I have a hard time believing a country "full of resorts" is more moral than a poverty-stricken neighbor.
 
Tim: What I was trying to get at is if Haiti literally made a pact.

I see where you are coming from with your response. [-]But you probably misunderstood the tone of my question[/-]. *[EDIT: I didn't ask my question properly. Sorry]*. I wasn't asking if the quake was a result of the pact. Actually, what I was trying to ask is if a pact (a literal one, done consciously) was even made in the first place. That's it.

Even if a pact was made, that doesn't make us or Haiti's neighbor more moral, as you and Austin have mentioned.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how a geographic area can make a pact. If there was a pact made by people truly representative of the Haitian people, yes, I really do think that would make a difference. "And all the people said, "His blood shall be on us and on our children!"". But without a good understanding of Haitian history, I'll wait for someone knowledgeable to chime in, and in the mean time assume Roberson's full of it as normal.
 
I'm not sure how a geographic area can make a pact. If there was a pact made by people truly representative of the Haitian people, yes, I really do think that would make a difference. \"And all the people said, \"His blood shall be on us and on our children!\"\". But without a good understanding of Haitian history, I'll wait for someone knowledgeable to chime in, and in the mean time assume Roberson's full of it as normal.

I read they had a voodoo service to a voodoo deity involving a pig sacrifice when they were planning to drive out the French, but it seems "pact with the devil" is Robertson's interpretation of that.

Edit: Here is an interesting article about Haiti's history: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1243016/ANDREW-MALONE-Rape-murder-voodoo-island-damned.html
 
Last edited:
I meant to post this yesterday when I saw it on a twitter post (now its on the Yahoo! from page). Anyways, is what Pat Robertson said correct?

Here's the video (comment is made at 0:30):
[video=youtube;f5TE99sAbwM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5TE99sAbwM[/video]

Right or wrong, he should remember:

Repent or Perish
1There were some present at that very time who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. 2And he answered them, "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way? 3No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. 4Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? 5No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish."
 
I'm not sure how a geographic area can make a pact. If there was a pact made by people truly representative of the Haitian people, yes, I really do think that would make a difference. \\"And all the people said, \\"His blood shall be on us and on our children!\\"\\". But without a good understanding of Haitian history, I'll wait for someone knowledgeable to chime in, and in the mean time assume Roberson's full of it as normal.

I read they had a voodoo service to a voodoo deity involving a pig sacrifice when they were planning to drive out the French, but it seems "pact with the devil" is Paterson's interpretation of that.

Edit: Here is an interesting article about Haiti's history: ANDREW MALONE: Rape, murder and voodoo on the island of the damned | Mail Online

Thanks for the article.
 
i think to understand the statement, you have to understand the language/bad theology.
this is all wrapped up in the "spiritual mapping" "spiritual stronghold" (Loren Cunningham/ John Dawson teachings)
it's all utter nonsense, and i cannot believe that i was having to explain these things to non Christians @ work today.
 
Hermonta, it's my opinion that he's implying that the Haiti disaster is a result of this "pact" that Haiti made with the devil while under French rule. The devil doesn't cut deals, and I'd like to know how Pat was privy to such a conversation anyway.

If one accepts the idea that there are real witches etc. with real power, doesn't one have to accept the idea of a pact with darkness to get that power? The only way outside of that is to believe that Satan grants power for free.
 
He is Word of Faith so that is why he can prove these people have been cursed simply because they are poor. He says that in so many words even in this video, though it is subtle, but that is all over his theology. So gross that theology.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top