Confessor
Puritan Board Senior
Someone I know proposed to me, contra the Puritan understanding of the RPW, that deciding to make a "unified" church calendar, chosen by man, is just as appointed by God as "aribtrarily" deciding to (e.g.) preach through a whole book at a time. Both are decisions by men, so why is the former considered against the RPW? He also stresses that the calendar is not obligatory, but merely permissible.
Here are his words:
I responded that preaching is supposed to be directed by Providence and not by a pre-chosen ecclesiastical calendar -- seeing as Providence cannot in principle move men to install such a thing. He replied that Providence as experienced by individual men is not objective and therefore arbitrary.
Am I missing anything here? How can I get to the crux of the argument?
Here are his words:
But here's a more practical and immediate question about the Church Calendar in general. What makes following the traditional schedule for remembering the life of Christ throughout the year, every year, any less Biblical than the way others who do not follow the calendar arbitrarily choose which sections and when to remember different aspects of Christ and His life and ministry?
I responded that preaching is supposed to be directed by Providence and not by a pre-chosen ecclesiastical calendar -- seeing as Providence cannot in principle move men to install such a thing. He replied that Providence as experienced by individual men is not objective and therefore arbitrary.
Am I missing anything here? How can I get to the crux of the argument?