Divine aseity and the regulative principle of worship

Not open for further replies.

Reformed Covenanter

Cancelled Commissioner
Have you ever come across an argument in Reformed literature that the regulative principle is a necessary consequence of the doctrine of divine aseity? I have thought about this question a bit over the last couple of days and can see why the RPW seems to follow from aseity, but, not placing a lot of confidence in my own judgment, I want to see who else has made this argument before. I have read a fair bit on theology proper and the RPW and do not recall reading anything to this effect.
I've thought about this as well before and it makes sense.

I think the closest I've come to seeing it discussed was in Bavinck's prolegomena though, since he brings up the RPW relatively frequently. I don't think he fully explained the argument anywhere that I remember. It might have been a necessary consequence from incomprehensibility more precisely in his discussion. I remember the basic flow being something like this:
  • God is transcendent above creation
  • God is not the passive object of human actions
  • Therefore knowledge of God must come from God, not from man
  • Therefore God prescribes how he is to worshipped
Not open for further replies.