Pilgrim Standard
Puritan Board Sophomore
I had a debate today with a russelite. In the process of the discussion the blind russelite was placing a heavy emphasis on the russelite teaching of Annihilationism. I realized that in his insistence on pressing an attacking any reality of hell, he was really denying any wrath of God (at least any wrath with substance.) The result was a denial of the necessity of the Divinity of Christ based on His ability to satisfy divine wrath.
Only a Divine Person of the Godhead could Satisfy Divine Wrath successfully. The false doctrine Nihilism was the tool used to attack the Necessity of the Deity of Christ.
Just an observation. Nihilism is more dangerous, heinous and wicked than an erroneous view of hell or the obvious problems it proposes at first glance.
Edit - In the above statements I meant annihilationism not Nihilism. Sorry for the confusion. I suppose this is another exercise for me in humility.
Only a Divine Person of the Godhead could Satisfy Divine Wrath successfully. The false doctrine Nihilism was the tool used to attack the Necessity of the Deity of Christ.
Just an observation. Nihilism is more dangerous, heinous and wicked than an erroneous view of hell or the obvious problems it proposes at first glance.
Edit - In the above statements I meant annihilationism not Nihilism. Sorry for the confusion. I suppose this is another exercise for me in humility.
Last edited by a moderator: