arapahoepark
Puritan Board Professor
I have been finding out through commentaries, particularly John Gill and NT Wright that they hold basically the same view of the olivet discourse, that it refers not to the second coming but 70 AD. The second coming though is true and elsewhere mentioned.
What are some views of the discourse, where 70 ad and the second relate? Where are the two questions seperated, verse 36 or earlier? What is the best way to go about the Olivet discourse? What of double fulfillment?
What are some views of the discourse, where 70 ad and the second relate? Where are the two questions seperated, verse 36 or earlier? What is the best way to go about the Olivet discourse? What of double fulfillment?
Last edited: