It has been stated on many threads that one of the sins of the FV proponents was that they did not use proper channels when bringing forth their new understanding of Paul and the nature of the 'works of the law'.
My question is this: If a man was compelled by the NPP teaching and kept his belilef to himself, he would not be considered a heretic because he was not causing division, right?
If so, what channels are appropriate for a man who thinks he has an important, 'fresh' outlook on scripture that would not cause division and yet allow the man to be heard? (I am not referring to myself because I haven't had a 'new idea' in years)
In other words,, how should FV proponants, hyper-preterists, paedocommunionists, feminists, tongues speakers etc. air their 'new perspectives' properly?
My question is this: If a man was compelled by the NPP teaching and kept his belilef to himself, he would not be considered a heretic because he was not causing division, right?
If so, what channels are appropriate for a man who thinks he has an important, 'fresh' outlook on scripture that would not cause division and yet allow the man to be heard? (I am not referring to myself because I haven't had a 'new idea' in years)
In other words,, how should FV proponants, hyper-preterists, paedocommunionists, feminists, tongues speakers etc. air their 'new perspectives' properly?