jwright82
Puritan Board Post-Graduate
I completely agree but I'd push it back to Descartes and Locke. But again I'm not really concerned about it. I was simply pointing out his credentials (which I know you don't dispute, and we would agree doesn't make him automatically right).He was very sharp on issues from Kant onwards. His stuff on patristic and medieval philosophy is surface-level. His stuff on 20th century philosophy is quite good.