RamistThomist
Puritanboard Clerk
I would have assumed (and it still could be) amillennial because he is Dutch. But he made this statement (which I saw online; I don't have the full context).
“We may not tamper with the real, graphic nature of the vision of Revelation 20, nor may we spiritualize the first resurrection.” – The Return of Christ, 307.
And I am not arguing whether a certain position is correct. Just trying to get clarification.
“We may not tamper with the real, graphic nature of the vision of Revelation 20, nor may we spiritualize the first resurrection.” – The Return of Christ, 307.
And I am not arguing whether a certain position is correct. Just trying to get clarification.