a mere housewife
Not your cup of tea
I noticed that Ursinus speaks of 'Scripture' and proceeds to give a reference from Wisdom with other Scripture, and then a few paragraphs later gives one from Ecclesiasticus. (This is in the section on 'The Causes of Sin' under 'Of Sin in General' in his commentary on the Heidelberg catechism -- point 3, that God is not the author of sin.) Could someone familiar with the standing of these books and the usage of them at the time explain? Thank you.
(I am sorry if this has been dealt with previously: I tried to do a search, but it pulled up so many threads not relating to the question, that I couldn't wade through them. Also, I'm unsure quite what forum this should go in, and if this isn't correct, I'd be very grateful if someone would refile it.)
(I am sorry if this has been dealt with previously: I tried to do a search, but it pulled up so many threads not relating to the question, that I couldn't wade through them. Also, I'm unsure quite what forum this should go in, and if this isn't correct, I'd be very grateful if someone would refile it.)