Matthew Henry's NT

Status
Not open for further replies.

satz

Puritan Board Senior
I've heard it said that Mathew Henry's new testament commentary is not really done by Henry himself but was completed posthumorously by others based on his notes.

Is this true, and if it is, is there any reason to regard his NT commentary as any less 'sound' than his OT ?
 
He completed up to Acts, and the rest of the commentary was executed on the basis of his MSS. So it is fair to say that the voice of Henry is there even when the words aren't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top