Frankfurt examples are hypothetical situations that demonstrate that a person is morally responsible for his choices even though he does not have the ability to choose otherwise. Some compatibilists use these examples to show that being morally responsible for one's actions does not require one to have the ability to choose otherwise.
Here is an example of a Frankfurt example. Suppose there is a neurosurgeon who implants a device in someone's brain and that person does not know about it. Suppose that he is at the voting booth. Suppose he always acts according to his desires. If he does not have the desire to vote Republican, the device will change his desire and cause him to have the desire to vote Republican. If he already has the desire to vote Republican, the device will not do anything. Suppose he already has the desire to vote Republican and he actually does vote Republican. The device did not do anything because he already had the desire to vote Republican. He freely chose to vote and he was morally responsible for his action. He was not forced to vote. He was in a situation where could not have chosen otherwise. If he did not have the desire to vote Republican, the device would have changed his desires. He freely chose to vote Republican even though he could not have done otherwise. The device did not force him to vote Republican. In fact, the device did not do anything. He was guaranteed to vote Republican, but he was still morally responsible for his actions.
What do you think of this example?
Here is an example of a Frankfurt example. Suppose there is a neurosurgeon who implants a device in someone's brain and that person does not know about it. Suppose that he is at the voting booth. Suppose he always acts according to his desires. If he does not have the desire to vote Republican, the device will change his desire and cause him to have the desire to vote Republican. If he already has the desire to vote Republican, the device will not do anything. Suppose he already has the desire to vote Republican and he actually does vote Republican. The device did not do anything because he already had the desire to vote Republican. He freely chose to vote and he was morally responsible for his action. He was not forced to vote. He was in a situation where could not have chosen otherwise. If he did not have the desire to vote Republican, the device would have changed his desires. He freely chose to vote Republican even though he could not have done otherwise. The device did not force him to vote Republican. In fact, the device did not do anything. He was guaranteed to vote Republican, but he was still morally responsible for his actions.
What do you think of this example?
Last edited: