sevenzedek
Puritan Board Junior
I did a quick search on the PB and did not find any threads conversing about the topic of the good and bad aspects of the NIV 2011.
I thought the general consensus of the evangelical world is that the gender inclusive language of the NIV 2011 makes it not only an inaccurate translation, but a translation that should not be recommended.
Recently, I have been challenged concerning some of my recent comments about the NIV 2011 and I would like to not test my convictions and provide a "landing spot" on the web for those who might do a search for the NIV 2011. If this is really a bad translation, then others would certainly be edified by hearing the negative reviews of those who might be taken seriously. If this is a good translation, then let it be commended.
Comments, quotes, an links are welcome.
Thanks.
I thought the general consensus of the evangelical world is that the gender inclusive language of the NIV 2011 makes it not only an inaccurate translation, but a translation that should not be recommended.
Recently, I have been challenged concerning some of my recent comments about the NIV 2011 and I would like to not test my convictions and provide a "landing spot" on the web for those who might do a search for the NIV 2011. If this is really a bad translation, then others would certainly be edified by hearing the negative reviews of those who might be taken seriously. If this is a good translation, then let it be commended.
Comments, quotes, an links are welcome.
Thanks.