Constantlyreforming
Puritan Board Sophomore
In reading Joseph Lathrop's book on infant baptism, he gives the example of Zaccheus' salvation as reason for infant baptism. Basically, the argument is that the reason that Christ gives for Zaccheus' household salvation is that he is a son of Abraham.
"‘Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost."
Lathrop insists that the EVERLASTING covenant established with Abraham, and the sign of that covenant, being circumcision has continued past the time of Christ, and that Christ supported the idea that this covenant household salvation goes into and past the time where He has been revealed as the Son of God. The idea that the sign of salvation/being part of the visible church has actually been shrunk rather than expanded after Christ's coming to earth he deems as a poor idea.
He argues that there would have been significant uprising by those in the Jewish community who were used to their children being included and treated as part of the Covenant, only to now be excluded in the supposed new better and more expansive covenant of Grace.
Thoughts? I can take some pictures of the pages if you want to do some reading of the actual text. It was quite interesting and convicting.
"‘Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost."
Lathrop insists that the EVERLASTING covenant established with Abraham, and the sign of that covenant, being circumcision has continued past the time of Christ, and that Christ supported the idea that this covenant household salvation goes into and past the time where He has been revealed as the Son of God. The idea that the sign of salvation/being part of the visible church has actually been shrunk rather than expanded after Christ's coming to earth he deems as a poor idea.
He argues that there would have been significant uprising by those in the Jewish community who were used to their children being included and treated as part of the Covenant, only to now be excluded in the supposed new better and more expansive covenant of Grace.
Thoughts? I can take some pictures of the pages if you want to do some reading of the actual text. It was quite interesting and convicting.