Anglicanorthodoxy
Puritan Board Freshman
This has always bothered me with wki. Whenever you look up an important Old Testament figure on Wikapedia, (Noah, Abraham, Mosses, etc)it'll always say something like this
"The historical/archeological consensus is that X was not an historical figure."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses
According to Wikapedia, Noah was a mythical figure.
Why does Wikapedia say this about these people? How could archaeology prove or disprove someone's existence? I don't understand the reasoning that's used on Wki.
"The historical/archeological consensus is that X was not an historical figure."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses
According to Wikapedia, Noah was a mythical figure.
Why does Wikapedia say this about these people? How could archaeology prove or disprove someone's existence? I don't understand the reasoning that's used on Wki.