CharlieJ
Puritan Board Junior
This post is mostly about labeling. Particularly, it concerns the common labeling of American non-Calvinists as "Arminian." From my experience, very few people label themselves Arminian. The typical non-Calvinist Baptist or Bible church person, if at all knowledgeable about the issues, would probably say something like this: "I am neither Calvinist nor Arminian. Both sides err. Calvinists err especially at limited atonement, and Arminians err especially at the insecurity of the believer."
I think it is fair to say that Jacob Arminius would not recognize himself in the writings of Dave Hunt or Norman Geisler, much less in the typical pew-sitter. Wesley as well would laugh out loud to hear people like that called Arminians. Similarly, if I were to announce on this board that I was a 3 (or maybe even 4) point Calvinist, you would rightly respond that I am no Calvinist at all. So, why do we saddle people with labels they reject when they don't seem to fit that well anyway? Isn't it time for a new term, or at least a modified one?
I think it is fair to say that Jacob Arminius would not recognize himself in the writings of Dave Hunt or Norman Geisler, much less in the typical pew-sitter. Wesley as well would laugh out loud to hear people like that called Arminians. Similarly, if I were to announce on this board that I was a 3 (or maybe even 4) point Calvinist, you would rightly respond that I am no Calvinist at all. So, why do we saddle people with labels they reject when they don't seem to fit that well anyway? Isn't it time for a new term, or at least a modified one?