What version of Calvin's institutes

Status
Not open for further replies.

JesusIsLord

Puritan Board Freshman
Good day guys, I see tons of versions of Calvin's institutes but I'm not sure which one to choose. Any suggestions?

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
There are 3 major editions of the Institutes:

The McNeill edition, https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0664220282/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=&sr= This is a standard academic edition. It is a little wooden in its translation when compared to Beveridge.

The Beveridge edition, https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1598...=WG84Q9Q8G16Q06FHWH5S&dpPl=1&dpID=51qfyACR1iL I think this one reads much more easily than McNeill, though I wouldn't suggest using it in an academic context.

And the new Banner of Truth edition, https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1848...=N3Z6Z3G1HDFRCX91Q65T&dpPl=1&dpID=81IpNC5FiTL I don't have a copy of this one, so I can't speak to its usefulness; but it has received very good reviews online.
 
There are 3 major editions of the Institutes:

The McNeill edition, https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0664220282/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=&sr= This is a standard academic edition. It is a little wooden in its translation when compared to Beveridge.

The Beveridge edition, https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1598...=WG84Q9Q8G16Q06FHWH5S&dpPl=1&dpID=51qfyACR1iL I think this one reads much more easily than McNeill, though I wouldn't suggest using it in an academic context.

And the new Banner of Truth edition, https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1848...=N3Z6Z3G1HDFRCX91Q65T&dpPl=1&dpID=81IpNC5FiTL I don't have a copy of this one, so I can't speak to its usefulness; but it has received very good reviews online.
Mcneill is the 2 volume set in Logos, correct?
 
That is all right... Think that the 2 volume set is the one most found being sold then, correct?

That's correct, but both versions are on logos.

Battles McNeil
https://www.logos.com/product/16036/institutes-of-the-christian-religion

Beveridge
https://www.logos.com/product/9472/institutes-of-the-christian-religion

And this one which I didn't know existed, Battles version of Calvins "little book" or the early institutes
https://www.logos.com/product/54172/institutes-of-the-christian-religion-1536-and-1541
 
Here's J. I. Packer, who has, apparently, read all four of the major English translations:

"No English translation fully matches Calvin's Latin. That of the Elizabethan, Thomas Norton [the first English translation - RZ], perhaps gets closest. [Henry] Beveridge gives us Calvin's feistiness, but not always his precision. [Ford Lewis] Battles gives us the precision, but not always the punchiness and fleetness of foot. Allen is smooth and clear, but low key."

From: A Theological Guide to Calvin's Institutes: Essays and Analysis, edited by David W. Hall and Peter A. Lillback; The Calvin 500 Series (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2008), p. x. From Packer's "Forward."

For what it's worth, Richard Muller is suspicious of the Battles translation, there being an (alleged) liberal bias in the notes (and maybe in the translation itself?). Battles taught at Hartford Theological Seminary. The editor of that edition, John T. McNeill, taught at Union Theological Seminary in New York. As someone noted earlier, Muller himself prefers the Allen translation (which, by the way, as a bonus, has a lengthy introduction by B. B. Warfield, no less).
 
I would recommend the Beveridge edition for beginners. I know this because I'm a rookie!

That Packer quote though! that guy is an absolute giant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for all your help guys. I have heard some of the audio version and it's quite helpful.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
I use the McNeill-Battles edition and find it helpful. Either way there are 2 excellent study resources.
1. Theological guide to Calvin's institutes edited by David W. Hall and Peter A. Lillback.
2. Knowing God and Ourselves: Reading Calvin's Institutes Devotionally by David Calhoun
 
I spent way too much time trying to decide what was the "best" version of the Institutes to read. I was so undecided that I delayed actually reading it, which I regret. I don't think you'll really suffer a loss no matter which version you pick, but don't delay reading it.

I went with Beveridge because it was convenient, but have read portions of Battles and Norton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top