CatechumenPatrick
Puritan Board Freshman
Since Van Til in particular, there has been a good amount of work done by Christians in philosophy. In some ways, Van Til’s call for an epistemologically self-conscious apologetic and methodology has been heeded by many Reformed. However, Van Til saw theology, philosophy, apologetics, and witnessing as different only by degrees, whereas I think there is still extant an antagonism in Reformed circles toward philosophy and a reductionism of apologetics. Sometimes it seems to me that we see Van Til’s “presuppositionalism” as a specifically apologetic method, even a single type of argument (transcendental), and not see it as a posture taken in all of life, inherent in the Reformed confessions and specifically in sola Scripture.
So, on that thought, what areas in philosophy do you think we Reformed have neglected? What areas could use more work? Obviously in philosophy as in theology the work is never finished, but what work do you think would most benefit the church at the current time? What books would you like to see? I am still thinking about my answer to these questions..
So, on that thought, what areas in philosophy do you think we Reformed have neglected? What areas could use more work? Obviously in philosophy as in theology the work is never finished, but what work do you think would most benefit the church at the current time? What books would you like to see? I am still thinking about my answer to these questions..