Wayne Grudem on purity and unity of the church

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jon 316

Puritan Board Sophomore
Wayne Grudem, in his systematic theology argues.

"There were no perfect churches at the time of the new testament and there will be no perfect churches until Christ returns. This means that Christians have no obligation to seek the purest church they can find and stay there, and then leave it if a purer church comes to there attention"

While no one would dispute the 1st sentence, I have some questions about the second.

1) Do Christians not have an obligation to find and join the 'purest church'?

2) How much 'impurity' in a local church should a believer have to tolerate?

3) When does a church cease to be a N.T church?

4) What should a Christian do, if in a church, with high levels of impurity?
 
Speak the truth in love. Teach until they will not listen to you. Leave when the Holy Spirit tells you that the Ichabod sign is about to be nailed above the door. I know that this is brief and blunt, but I have learned the hard way that sometimes there are good people in a congregation where the leadership has gone bad and you just have to hug them and tell them why you are leaving.
 
1) Do Christians not have an obligation to find and join the 'purest church'?

There are also other factors to consider such as distance, and personal relationship that you have to the members. One can (and maybe should) attend a closer and more close-knit church if you are able to better bless the brethren than to drive 3 hours to a more pure church with less fellowship.


2) How much 'impurity' in a local church should a believer have to tolerate?

There are major and minor doctrines.... soteriology is more major, eschatology is more minor... Don't tolerateheresy but don't choke on gnats either.

Figure out which hills are worth dying on and guard those.




3) When does a church cease to be a N.T church?

When it's official from-the-pulpit teachings are heretical I would say. Churches can be irregular or in error and still be churches (i.e. either paedos are credos are wrong, but both belong to real churches).


4) What should a Christian do, if in a church, with high levels of impurity?

What did Paul dowith Corinth? Try to purify it, or leave.
 
Leave when the Holy Spirit tells you that the Ichabod sign is about to be nailed above the door.

I guess this could be subjective and misenterpreted. How would you discern if this was the case.

-----Added 1/14/2009 at 06:27:49 EST-----

some good points there Pergy
 
Wayne Grudem, in his systematic theology argues.

"There were no perfect churches at the time of the new testament and there will be no perfect churches until Christ returns. This means that Christians have no obligation to seek the purest church they can find and stay there, and then leave it if a purer church comes to there attention"

While no one would dispute the 1st sentence, I have some questions about the second.

1) Do Christians not have an obligation to find and join the 'purest church'?

2) How much 'impurity' in a local church should a believer have to tolerate?

3) When does a church cease to be a N.T church?

4) What should a Christian do, if in a church, with high levels of impurity?

1) Christians have an obligation to join a true church.
"it is the duty of all believers, according to the word of God, to separate their very selves from those who are established outside the Church and to join their very selves to this assembly and congregation of the faithful, wherever God has established it, regardless of whether hostile decrees of princes and magistrates forbid it, even those who would do so indicting with a punishment of beheading and death of the body." (from the Belgic Confession, Article 28)


2 & 3) The three marks of the true church must be present.
Therefore the true Church will be distinguished from the false by these marks; if the pure preaching of the Gospel and the legitimate administration of the sacraments, according to the prescription of Christ, flourishes, likewise if the right ecclesiastical discipline is used for the restraint of sin. (from the Belgic Confession, Article 29

4) Appeal to classis/presbytery if unBiblical doctrine is taught or discipline goes awry. Appeal to synod if finally necessary.
 
Leave when the Holy Spirit tells you that the Ichabod sign is about to be nailed above the door.

I guess this could be subjective and misenterpreted. How would you discern if this was the case.

-----Added 1/14/2009 at 06:27:49 EST-----

some good points there Pergy


The scripture tells us what to do when problems occur in a local Church. Some have to do with individuals, some with the leadership, some with the overall attitude of the congregation. Some problems are obvious, some take a while to figure out. Some offenses are severe, some are not. The severe ones that go unchecked are the indicators that Jesus is no longer present and if a congregation remains there, it will decay into a synagogue of Satan.

When absolutes are violated with no repentance, leave immediately. Denying Christ's humanity or divinity, works based salvation are some doctrinal examples. Sexually immoral leaders who promote others to accept them as is and promote others to do the same, leave. An arrogant, ill tempered pastor who is 'my way or the highway" and uses fear to manipulate people, leave. These are examples of where I believe the sign is posted
When lots of manlaw starts to be promoted and is held above scripture, I would leave. The doctrinal statement may look good, but the practice isn't.
This is not an exhaustive list, but I think it makes my drift clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top