Polanus1561
Puritan Board Junior
I believe he does not adhere to it.
But it seems he devotes space to discuss the DH views of things, especially in the chapter on Deuteronomy.
I don't understand this practice, why devote time on something you do not believe in? Is it just a scholarly practice that I don't understand?
Fantastic book btw, but I do wish there were more conservative options for an OT theology, something that expands on Vos' immense work on the OT in Biblical Theology. I am enjoying Beale and thought that Waltke would be a good OT theological book, but how I wished that JEDP nonsense would be rid of, I guess this is one of those books where you sift for the wheat..
Is Paul House more conservative? Gamble seems attractive too.
@greenbaggins , thoughts on the above?
But it seems he devotes space to discuss the DH views of things, especially in the chapter on Deuteronomy.
I don't understand this practice, why devote time on something you do not believe in? Is it just a scholarly practice that I don't understand?
Fantastic book btw, but I do wish there were more conservative options for an OT theology, something that expands on Vos' immense work on the OT in Biblical Theology. I am enjoying Beale and thought that Waltke would be a good OT theological book, but how I wished that JEDP nonsense would be rid of, I guess this is one of those books where you sift for the wheat..
Is Paul House more conservative? Gamble seems attractive too.
@greenbaggins , thoughts on the above?