RickyReformed
Puritan Board Freshman
Has anyone encountered any works concerning how Dr. Van Til's understanding of the natural man and his inability to reason correctly affect the doctrine of assurance? I understand Dr. Van Til to say that unregenerate individuals cannot reason correctly (i.e. with Christian presuppositions). *If I am correctly interpreting Dr. Van Til*, would it not follow that if you can reason correctly, then you are not an unregenerate individual? Can someone explain and expand on whether I am correctly or mistakenly understanding Van Til's thought?
It seems to me that if I'm correct then perhaps the Auburn Avenue/Federal Vision proponents are utilizing the wrong vehicle for delivering assurance (baptism)?
Any thoughts?
It seems to me that if I'm correct then perhaps the Auburn Avenue/Federal Vision proponents are utilizing the wrong vehicle for delivering assurance (baptism)?
Any thoughts?