Neogillist
Puritan Board Freshman
I found an interesting discussion on the following blog by a professor of philosophical theology in the UK Helm's Deep. I usually don't read blogs because most are put up by ignorant people who think they know a lot, but this one I find really good.
Read the following: Helm's Deep: Analysis 12 - Twisse's Twist
Afterwards, you may read John Owen's view of God's sovereignty here: Helm's Deep: Analysis 13 - Owen's Option
Personally, I agree with Twisse, Perkin and Rutherford. God's will is primary, although it does not contradict His nature. I have been studying the book of Job lately, and in view of what Job suffered as an innocent and upright man, Twisse is right, that God can rightfully inflict pain on his creatures for his own glory just as when we put our beasts to work for our own use.
Read the following: Helm's Deep: Analysis 12 - Twisse's Twist
Afterwards, you may read John Owen's view of God's sovereignty here: Helm's Deep: Analysis 13 - Owen's Option
Personally, I agree with Twisse, Perkin and Rutherford. God's will is primary, although it does not contradict His nature. I have been studying the book of Job lately, and in view of what Job suffered as an innocent and upright man, Twisse is right, that God can rightfully inflict pain on his creatures for his own glory just as when we put our beasts to work for our own use.
Last edited: