Has anyone else seen last week's Time magazine? The cover shows a picture of Jesus with the headline "Did He Really Have to Die?" (or something equally inane).
Let me get this straight - Time magazine thinks that they have such a crack reporting team that they are going to disprove the need for Christ's Blood? Did they get an exclusive with Jehovah? Did they get Abraham's perspective, after almost having to sacrifice Isaac? How about Isaac's need for therapy afterwards?
Oh wait. Maybe they are just soooooo far removed from Christianity that they completely don't get that
YES HE DID.
Just a short rant. I feel better now. Honestly. Sometimes I just have to laugh out loud at the sheer idiocy. They wanted to get a little profit off the coat-tails of that movie (whose name I won't mention) and THIS was the best cover story they could come up with...ARGH!
:zapped:
Let me get this straight - Time magazine thinks that they have such a crack reporting team that they are going to disprove the need for Christ's Blood? Did they get an exclusive with Jehovah? Did they get Abraham's perspective, after almost having to sacrifice Isaac? How about Isaac's need for therapy afterwards?
Oh wait. Maybe they are just soooooo far removed from Christianity that they completely don't get that
YES HE DID.
Just a short rant. I feel better now. Honestly. Sometimes I just have to laugh out loud at the sheer idiocy. They wanted to get a little profit off the coat-tails of that movie (whose name I won't mention) and THIS was the best cover story they could come up with...ARGH!
:zapped: