Willflyforfood
Puritan Board Freshman
I've always been a classical/evidential apologist, and due to what I now know to be unfair charicatures of the presup method (and frustration at many presuppositionalists' unfair characterization of the classical method) I've always avoided the presup method. Well, I feel it's time I learn more about it and figured you guys would be the people to ask!
1) Any suggestions for good resources/books for newbies to the method?
2) I've gathered the basic gist of presup is to attempt to show that any competing worldview must borrow from the Christian worldview to make sense at all. Is this a correct understanding?
3) Would plantinga's EAAN (evolutionary argument against naturalism) be considered presup? Is plantinga a generally presup apologist? He seems to be the closest example among the authors I read.
Thanks in advance for any help!!
1) Any suggestions for good resources/books for newbies to the method?
2) I've gathered the basic gist of presup is to attempt to show that any competing worldview must borrow from the Christian worldview to make sense at all. Is this a correct understanding?
3) Would plantinga's EAAN (evolutionary argument against naturalism) be considered presup? Is plantinga a generally presup apologist? He seems to be the closest example among the authors I read.
Thanks in advance for any help!!