Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot of Reformed principia and prolegomena were open to the idea of knowledge gained via natural revelation (if not a full orbed natural theology). And they probably allowed for the possibility of knowledge gained via sense experience.
Thank you for your reply. Could you provide me any references or quotations?
You could review this:Thank you for your reply. Could you provide me any references or quotations?
From the start, something seemed wrong and off about Scripturalism. It seemed very contrary to what I understood to be Reformed thought.
You could review this:
http://www.proginosko.com/aquascum/summary.htm
In fairness to the opposing view see a response to the above:
http://scripturalism.com/10-reasons-to-reject-scripturalism-a-response-part-8-of-10/
I find myself in much greater agreement with Mr. Clark than with Mr. Van Til
Update: I now have a small understanding of Vantillianism and I reject it.
So quickly and with a "small" understanding you reject it?? That's a bold statement!
Which works by Van Til, Bahnsen, Oliphint, and Frame have you read? Mind you, I am not a Van Tillian.
Is it unreasonable to reject a system of thought if one finds the foundations to be corrupt?
No, you don't have to read all of those guys, but if you haven't read any of the major sources (and some of them are short), then I question if one really knows the system.
Could you direct me to the short major sources, then?
Bahnsen, Always Ready. Some of The book is available here.
http://www.cmfnow.com/freearticles.aspx
Frame, Apologetics to the Glory of God.
http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/pa078.htm
http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/pa072.htm
http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/pa210.htm
Thank you for the references.