Ruling Elders and the Sacraments

Is it always wrong for a RULING elder to perform (lead) the sacraments

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 42.1%
  • No

    Votes: 11 57.9%

  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

G

Puritan Board Senior
Good Day All,

Being new to being a Presbyterian and specifically the PCA Churh Order. I still am working through undestanding the PCA practices.

Now to the matter.

In my opinion, since a ruling elder must be able to teach the word and can Preach the Word in a sermon (occasionally), then i see no problem with a Ruling Elder leading or preforming the sacraments. After all if the sacraments are always accompanied by the Word and if the PCA allows a ruling Elder to preach and minister the Word to the Peolple (occasionally) on the Lord’s Day... I see no reason why Ruling Elder cannot perform a baptism or lead the congregation through the Lord’s supper. Let me know your thoughts (especially if you are Presbyterian). I think my current view is still within the Westminster Standards but is outside the BCO. I am still new to this.

1. Share your thoughts

2. Hit the Poll
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ask Mr. Religion

Flatly Unflappable
I assume you mean by perform (lead) you are implying administer, which I take to include—in addition to presiding overconducting worship of God via the means of the sacrament.

Under that specific assumption I fail to see how the PCA RE can do so as the minister of the Word and sacrament is the responsibility of the one ordained to that office.

Can they assist the TE in distribution of the elements? Sure.

See also:
http://www.pcahistory.org/pca/clerk/taylor_REs_administering_sacraments.pdf
http://pcahistory.org/pca/2-455.html

Bookmark this as you continue your PCA journey:
http://pcahistory.org/index.html ;)
Also @Wayne may be contacted when dealing with PCA historical matters.

Now all that said, I seem to recall someone posting somewhere that exceptions were allowed in the PCA in one of the California presbyteries. @fredtgreco could probably shed some light on this.
 

Jake

Puritan Board Junior
Just curious.. what would you say that the ruling elder cannot do that the teaching elder can?
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
Just curious.. what would you say that the ruling elder cannot do that the teaching elder can?
The PCA says a RE cannot administer baptism (cannot literally apply baptism to a Christian or child of a Christian).

Also the PCA says a RE cannot LEAD (instruct th congregation through partaking in Lord’s Supper).

Of which in the PCA only the TE can do. At least that is my understanding. Currently I think I disagree. I think if you are a qualified Elder (TE or RE) who is allowed to preach the word, then you should be allowed to perform all the roles in administering and leading the congregation in either sacrament.

Otherwise it seems normally you have to have higher education ( most TEs have seminary) to perform the sacraments. Which, I cannot find in the scripture or the standards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

G

Puritan Board Senior
I assume you mean by perform (lead) you are implying administer, which I take to include—in addition to presiding overconducting worship of God via the means of the sacrament.

Under that specific assumption I fail to see how the PCA RE can do so as the minister of the Word and sacrament is the responsibility of the one ordained to that office.

Can they assist the TE in distribution of the elements? Sure.

See also:
http://www.pcahistory.org/pca/clerk/taylor_REs_administering_sacraments.pdf
http://pcahistory.org/pca/2-455.html

Bookmark this as you continue your PCA journey:
http://pcahistory.org/index.html ;)
Also @Wayne may be contacted when dealing with PCA historical matters.

Now all that said, I seem to recall someone posting somewhere that exceptions were allowed in the PCA in one of the California presbyteries. @fredtgreco could probably shed some light on this.
Your assumptions are correct. I am okay with Having 2 classes of elder (R&T) and i can even see that in the Bible. But what I cannot see is that if RE are allowed to administer the word (I beleiv he is too)..... a RE could even be licensed, but they still could not administer the sacraments in the PCA. I do not see that in scripture or the standards.
 

Ryan&Amber2013

Puritan Board Junior
I think Grant has a good point. Our pulpit is elevated higher over the sacraments to display the supremacy of preaching. Our ruling elder is able to preach from the pulpit but not administer the sacraments? That sounds funny but maybe I'm missing something. It sounds like a pilot being able to fly a giant passenger jet but denied being able to fly a private cruiser plane.
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
A ruling elder is not permitted to preach regularly without being licensed (BCO 19).
Yes I am familiar with that. But a ruling elder is allowed to preach from the pulpit irregular nonetheless… Correct?

Also a licensed ruling elder is still not allowed to administer The sacraments in the same way a teaching elder is allowed to in the PCA correct?
 

Gforce9

Puritan Board Junior
I think Grant has a good point. Our pulpit is elevated higher over the sacraments to display the supremacy of preaching. Our ruling elder is able to preach from the pulpit but not administer the sacraments? That sounds funny but maybe I'm missing something. It sounds like a pilot being able to fly a giant passenger jet but denied being able to fly a private cruiser plane.
Ryan,
I am not familiar with PCA polity, but 3 office Presbyterians, like the OPC, would not consider a ruling elder or a licentiate to be "preaching". The statement you made above (that an elder may preach, but not administer the sacraments) would not be true in 3 office polity. I'm interested to know how the PCA deals with this as well...
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
Ryan,
I am not familiar with PCA polity, but 3 office Presbyterians, like the OPC, would not consider a ruling elder or a licentiate to be "preaching". The statement you made above (that an elder may preach, but not administer the sacraments) would not be true in 3 office polity. I'm interested to know how the PCA deals with this as well...
I think that the Bible only advocates for two separate offices within the church. Is that not upheld in the OPC.

Would you mind elaborating, on the OPC‘s three offices and what the limitation of each office is
? I assume you see a RE as a separate office making 3 Deacon, RE, and TE?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ryan&Amber2013

Puritan Board Junior
Ryan,
I am not familiar with PCA polity, but 3 office Presbyterians, like the OPC, would not consider a ruling elder or a licentiate to be "preaching". The statement you made above (that an elder may preach, but not administer the sacraments) would not be true in 3 office polity. I'm interested to know how the PCA deals with this as well...
That's interesting. So what would our ruling elder be doing from the pulpit if it's not called preaching?
 

fredtgreco

Vanilla Westminsterian
Staff member
Yes I am familiar with that. But a ruling elder is allowed to preach from the pulpit irregular nonetheless… Correct?

Also a licensed ruling elder is still not allowed to administer The sacraments in the same way a teaching elder is allowed to in the PCA correct?
A man who is not a ruling elder may preach (but not regularly). The administration of the sacraments is tied to the exposition of the Word, and that is a part of the teaching elder's office, not the ruling elder's. The sacraments have no power apart from the Word.
 

Ask Mr. Religion

Flatly Unflappable
Your assumptions are correct. I am okay with Having 2 classes of elder (R&T) and i can even see that in the Bible. But what I cannot see is that if RE are allowed to administer the word (I beleiv he is too)..... a RE could even be licensed, but they still could not administer the sacraments in the PCA. I do not see that in scripture or the standards.
I believe I read elsewhere in one of your posts, you are new to PCA and studying for the PCA Diaconate. Is this correct? If your session is considering you to be a Deacon, what is the local session/presbytery doing to aid you in your studies? I only ask because I see several comments hinting you are heading towards taking exceptions to various PCA positions that you feel are not supported by Scripture or the Standards.
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
A man who is not a ruling elder may preach (but not regularly). The administration of the sacraments is tied to the exposition of the Word, and that is a part of the teaching elder's office, not the ruling elder's. The sacraments have no power apart from the Word.
Fred,

That is interesting. So when a ruling Elder preaches from the pulpit ocassionally, is he not expositing the word?

Would a man be allowed to preach from the pulpit and not attempt to faithfully exsposit the word?
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
I believe I read elsewhere in one of your posts, you are new to PCA and studying for the PCA Diaconate. Is this correct? If your session is considering you to be a Deacon, what is the local session/presbytery doing to aid you in your studies? I only ask because I see several comments hinting you are heading towards taking exceptions to various PCA positions that you feel are not supported by Scripture or the Standards.
Various???What other exceptions? I have no exceptions with our standards, but only 1 with the section of the BCO that says only a teaching elder (excluding the RE) can administer the sacraments.

I am reading the BCO, the standards, and a Book by a reformed author on the office of a deacon. Also we are meeting weekly (Sunday nights) to discuss readings.

Obviously the most important part is that the sacraments are preformed rightly. I would likely not even take exception and am fully willing to submit to the practice and not and not teach contrary.
 

Gforce9

Puritan Board Junior
I think that the Bible only advocates for two separate offices within the church. Is that not upheld in the OPC.

Would you mind elaborating, on the OPC‘s three offices and what the limitation of each office is? I assume you see a RE as a separate office making 3 Deacon, RE, and TE?
Minister (word/sacrament), elder (rule), deacon (mercy).
 

Ask Mr. Religion

Flatly Unflappable
Various???What other exceptions? I have no exceptions with our standards, but only 1 with the section of the BCO that says only a teaching elder (excluding the RE) can administer the sacraments.
I see. By taking exception(s) to various PCA positions I meant the singular exception in question, to which there are plural PCA position materials. You can call that bad grammar on my part.

On the matter at hand, you might consider 1 Sam 13. Saul was wrong to offer sacrifice when Samuel was not readily available. ;)
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
I see. By taking exception(s) to various PCA positions I meant the singular exception in question, to which there are plural PCA position materials. You can call that bad grammar on my part.

On the matter at hand, you might consider 1 Sam 13. Saul was wrong to offer sacrifice when Samuel was not readily available. ;)
You had me worried I was headed for liberalism..:flamingscot:

I will check that chapter out.
 

Gforce9

Puritan Board Junior
Thanks brother.

So your Elders are not allowed to preach from the pulpit at all?
They would be allowed to exhort. The difference in the language (preach-vs-exhort) may seem trivial but, as Fred indicated, is tied to the office. @Alan D. Strange would be a wealth of insight into this and the difference between the OPC, for example, and the PCA......
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
I see. By taking exception(s) to various PCA positions I meant the singular exception in question, to which there are plural PCA position materials. You can call that bad grammar on my part.

On the matter at hand, you might consider 1 Sam 13. Saul was wrong to offer sacrifice when Samuel was not readily available. ;)
I have also read Guy Waters “How Jesus runs his Church” ... very helpful, but still questions and doubts on this particular subject.
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
They would be allowed to exhort. The difference in the language (preach-vs-exhort) may seem trivial but, as Fred indicated, is tied to the office. @Alan D. Strange would be a wealth of insight into this and the difference between the OPC, for example, and the PCA......
True but as I understand, The PCA only recognizes 2 offices. And the Elder office is seen as having 2 classes, but not so far as to see 2 sperAte Elder offices.
 

G

Puritan Board Senior
I can’t remember off the top of my head, but do the Westminster standards (including the confession and the catechisms) stipulate the number of ordained
offices that should exist in a church?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top