MRC
Puritan Board Freshman
I have read Roberton's text on CT and am currently plowing through Horton. One observation so far is that Horton sets a clear delineation between CoW and CoG, where Robertson seems to overlay them more viewing the Mosaic covenant as an administration of the CoG. Would it be fair to say that Horton does not view the Mosaic covenant as administering the CoG? Does Robertson see two covenants in scripture? My reading of Robertson is that Abraham, Moses, David and Christ were all different administrations of grace (he uses some different terminology for the covenants), implying that the law is one method that God used to administer the CoG at that time (and continues to in a sense). In my view Horton delineates the two more clearly, viewing the CoG as God's intention for salvation and the CoW as God's intention for land promises (and general corporate blessing continuing into the NT).
To those CT experts out there: am I understanding the contrast between Horton and Robertson fairly?
To those CT experts out there: am I understanding the contrast between Horton and Robertson fairly?