Romans922
Puritan Board Professor
Having not read the book but the review, it bothers me that Rev. Myers, who I believe is RPCNA, calls CT translations “Satan’s Bible.” Is this a widespread belief among CB advocates, as opposed to being “inferior”? It would seem that pastors who believe CT promoters are promoting the devil’s work should be bringing the CT users up on church disciplinary charges for corrupting the Word of God. If it’s not worth this, they should stop using such incendiary (slanderous?) language.
Perhaps you should read the article instead of just the review (which is obviously very much against the book/conclusions) before coming to such conclusions. Mr. Ward has an axe to grind, and if you read the book you will find that Mr. Myers doesn't call translations "Satan's Bible". He does say that they are based on Satan's Bible.