Why is it that only “major” debaters count? Do not the conversations I’ve had count? Why can’t I be my own apologist?
Sure, it counts. But the reason that William Lane Craig represents classical apologetics and I do not is because he has visibility.
Is it because Durbin thus invalidates the typical caricature you so often present of presuppositionalists?
By what authority do you get to decide who does and who does not “count”?
You have to presuppose my system before you can even make sense of that question.