Sure, it counts. But the reason that William Lane Craig represents classical apologetics and I do not is because he has visibility.Why is it that only “major” debaters count? Do not the conversations I’ve had count? Why can’t I be my own apologist?
yes.Is it because Durbin thus invalidates the typical caricature you so often present of presuppositionalists?
You have to presuppose my system before you can even make sense of that question.By what authority do you get to decide who does and who does not “count”?