Afterthought
Puritan Board Senior
Do picture Bibles or graphic Bibles inherently cause its readers to worship God by an image, even if there are no pictures of a Divine Person? The idea behind the question is: Images are not supposed to be "books for the laymen" but instead "teach lies," so isn't making a picture or graphic Bible doing this? Especially if the Bible is intended for either people who cannot read or for providing "enhanced" or more "detailed" information than the Scriptures alone give (pictures speak a thousand words)? And if the picture Bible does not add anything to what the Scriptures give, then why make one to begin with?