A.Joseph
Puritan Board Senior
Here’s the guy that got the ball rolling (Wesley Hill@wesleyhill)…..and a few of his RTs
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is some of the best advice I have heard. I admit I was kind of being flippant about the good Dr leaving to the RPCNA. I apologize.I have feelings and thoughts but I'm not in charge. Is it bad. Yes, it's bad. A minority thinks it is lost already. But I've heard that from people in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, and now in the 2020s. Of course each time how bad it is gets worse. Those outside looking in should pray for and give space to those who will mainly be organizing any effort of where the conservatives go from here after the overtures failing to pass 2/3rds of the presbyteries. It will be hard enough without also having a raucous chorus from outside yelling flee, flee in their ears.
Wesley Hill, who is essentially the founder of Side-B, seems to be an admirer (see his retweet). Sound doctrine matters.@Kester_Smith76
I'm no fan of neoorthodoxy, but can you give a reference to Karl Barth supporting the "side-b" issues?
Wesley Hill, who is essentially the founder of Side-B, seems to be an admirer (see his retweet). Sound doctrine matters.
To be clear, I'm not necessarily faulting anyone who has left the PCA nor saying none of the reasons were good for leaving the PCA over the years. I left the PCA before I was back in it (Kerry-esque I know) and I left before Frank did so I'm certainly not faulting him when he left for his reasons (before that I thought he was one of those who'd turn out the lights as the last real presbyterians left the pca). There's always been a lot not to like about the PCA from the standpoint of biblical Reformed Presbyterianism.That is some of the best advice I have heard. I admit I was kind of being flippant about the good Dr leaving to the RPCNA. I apologize.
Being newish to the PCA and confessionalism this thread has been concerning to read. While I can be glad my presbytery voted in favor I also note it was far from unamious. What has me on increased edge is my church is searching for a senior pastor.The PCA is not currently apostate; so, there is no necessity of departure laid on anyone currently. Neither is there some cowardice as some have implied if one determines it is time to leave. My personal opinion is that each church's session should judge whether they are in a strong enough position to remain and do good in their presbytery and at GA, whatever the state of their presbytery, or, if it is best on any number of arguments to guide the church to another *existing denomination. However, if there is a Disruption like mass departure, which would be hard to imagine, so it would be remarkable if that were to happen, strongly consider being a part of that.
*We don't need another new presbyterian denomination in my opinion, unless it is a strict no exceptions confessional old school southern presbyterian true succcessor to the PCUS.
I'm currently on my church's search committee for a replacement for the pastor who wants to retire. You may want to ask the session in some other way, but I would ask someone on the PC if you could submit questions to the PC for consideration to ask the prospective candidates or ask to be sure that the PC is going to ask candidates about if they take any of the usual exceptions like on images of Christ, the recreations clause w.r.t. the Lord's Day, and if they are drilling down on Revoice, CRT and other issues in their questions for candidates. The PC if it is separate from the case where it is the session itself, is called by the church; so in that case approach the PC directly; otherwise ask an elder. Our PC spent considerably effort drafting a questionnaire in a attempt to cover all these concerns and make sure we are getting strictly confessional candidates. In an older thread folks asked if our questions were available to other PCs to make use of. I have asked and have clearance to share our questionnaire with any that ask me who want to make use of them for PCs.Being newish to the PCA and confessionalism this thread has been concerning to read. While I can be glad my presbytery voted in favor I also note it was far from unamious. What has me on increased edge is my church is searching for a senior pastor.
Any advice for me, as a lay member, to address my concerns* with the session and pastor search committee?
* Not just on these overtures but (as mentioned) also violations (and failure to teach) the 2nd and 4th commandments
I found a few threads with various complaints against Tim Keller's theology. Is there any threads or sites with a better summary to help me understand "Tim Kelleresque"?Tim Kelleresque
Thank you, sir, for your quick reply. Can I get a copy?I'm currently on my church's search committee for a replacement for the pastor who wants to retire. You may want to ask the session in some other way, but I would ask someone on the PC if you could submit questions to the PC for consideration to ask the prospective candidates or ask to be sure that the PC is going to ask candidates about if they take any of the usual exceptions like on images of Christ, the recreations clause w.r.t. the Lord's Day, and if they are drilling down on Revoice, CRT and other issues in their questions for candidates. The PC if it is separate from the case where it is the session itself, is called by the church; so in that case approach the PC directly; otherwise ask an elder. Our PC spent considerably effort drafting a questionnaire in a attempt to cover all these concerns and make sure we are getting strictly confessional candidates. In an older thread folks asked if our questions were available to other PCs to make use of. I have asked and have clearance to share our questionnaire with any that ask me who want to make use of them for PCs.
Yes; message me (via Conversations upper right next to username) your email and I'll send. Specify if doc format is okay or not.Thank you, sir, for your quick reply. Can I get a copy?
I guess I am a little bit confused about why these overtures make such a distinction between church leaders and ordinary members. From the ByFaith link above:
"Should ordained officers in the PCA be permitted to identify as gay or #LGBTinChrist on social media? Are they qualified for office if they do?
In the Orthodox Presbyterian church, Book of Church OrderHope you are having a blessed Sabbath day brother. What does it mean to apply for membership? Is there an application you have to fill out or an interview process to undertake? Forgive me for ignorance, I don't know much about Presbyterian church membership [emoji846]
Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
I’m not drawing a direct correlation.I've read through four volumes of Barth, including his volume on ethics, as well as some of his leading interpreters (all of whom would probably be friendly to "side-B" stuff). We just don't have any evidence that Barth was side-B. That issue wasn't debated. His sexual sins were of a more heterosexual nature (and that is well-documented).
No doubt, but this is a serious charge to bring and does not align with the 9th commandment.
“as well as some of his leading interpreters (all of whom would probably be friendly to "side-B" stuff)”…. That’s all I meant. Sorry for the misunderstanding!!! I didn’t mean anything further. Just a more liberal bent.I've read through four volumes of Barth, including his volume on ethics, as well as some of his leading interpreters (all of whom would probably be friendly to "side-B" stuff). We just don't have any evidence that Barth was side-B. That issue wasn't debated. His sexual sins were of a more heterosexual nature (and that is well-documented).
I found a few threads with various complaints against Tim Keller's theology. Is there any threads or sites with a better summary to help me understand "Tim Kelleresque"?
Thank you, brother, not least for causing me to think more deeply about the process I am engaged in. I am requesting this local PCA session, as authoritative representation of Christ's Church, to grant me permission to commune at the Lord's Table and to commit themselves to exercise regular pastoral care over me and my family, including disciplining us, as needed. In support of this application, I am prepared to testify that I have been baptized by a Christian church, that I recognize that I am a sinner, that my only hope is Christ's redemption, that I believe the Bible is the only final revealed spiritual authority, that I am prepared to submit in good faith to session's spiritual oversight, and that I promise to be faithful in attendance at public worship and to exercise my spiritual gifts for the good of Christ's Church, particularly in this congregation. I plan also to request a letter of dismissal from my previous denomination, a sister of the PCA, evidencing I am currently a member there in good standing. In response to this application, it is this session's duty to assure itself that my profession of faith is credible, i.e., that my words and actions comport with my profession. It is common for OPC and PCA sessions to discharge this responsibility by means of an "inquirer's class," lasting several weeks, wherein a representative of session covers the basics of church doctrine, responsibilities of membership, and briefly outlines presbyterian governance. This class also serves as a time when the inquirer may raise questions. In the case of dismissal from a sister denomination, applicants are to "give a testimony of Christian experience to Session" and thereafter "[t]heir names are to be announced to the congregation with a recommendation of them to its Christian confidence and affection" (PCA FoG 57-6, https://www.pcaac.org/bco/).Hope you are having a blessed Sabbath day brother. What does it mean to apply for membership? Is there an application you have to fill out or an interview process to undertake? Forgive me for ignorance, I don't know much about Presbyterian church membership [emoji846]
Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
He hung out with Stalinists in East Berlin, so he had a big influence on the central committee of the communist party. Barthianism became the religion of the state protestant church in Soviet-occupied E Germany with the 1960s policy of "Church in Socialism". Yet reformed seminaries in the US still study him. Like Bonhoeffer, read him in different languages and he "says" different things; always sounds better in English.
,He hung out with Stalinists in East Berlin, so he had a big influence on the central committee of the communist party. Barthianism became the religion of the state protestant church in Soviet-occupied E Germany with the 1960s policy of "Church in Socialism". Yet reformed seminaries in the US still study him. Like Bonhoeffer, read him in different languages and he "says" different things; always sounds better in English.
I do not remember, but there is very little in English, so it would be in German and I looked through downloaded files and have not found it. On the internet, keyword would be "die Kirche im Sozialismus". State "peoples own enterprise" (VEB) publishing houses started printing dialectical theology books, Luther became a great precursor hero of the marxists, along with Bonhoeffer. I think sermons on both sides sounded about the same---barthian or liberal, you had to go to an independent free church to actually hear the gospel.What documents do you have that showed he was instrumental on the central committee of the communist Party in Berlin? The only one I know of is where he publicly denied any desire to live under Communism (Barth, Karl. "No Angels of Darkness and Light", The Christian Century, 20 January 1960, pp. 72 ff.).
I have no love for Karl Barth, but I never thought he was a doctrinaire communist.