I'm taking a one week class on the Revelation, and was surprised when my professor wasn't a typical Dispensational even though I had been told he wasn't.
I've never heard of his interpretation though. Ala Osborne, he takes an eclectic approach somewhere between idealist and preterist, but his form of preterism is what's odd. It has nothing to do with Rome. He believes that the passages concerning Babylon, the beast, etc. are all in reference to 1st century Judaism. It was odd. At least he gave a good defense of an early dating of the book.
[Edited on 5-1-2005 by Ranger]
I've never heard of his interpretation though. Ala Osborne, he takes an eclectic approach somewhere between idealist and preterist, but his form of preterism is what's odd. It has nothing to do with Rome. He believes that the passages concerning Babylon, the beast, etc. are all in reference to 1st century Judaism. It was odd. At least he gave a good defense of an early dating of the book.
[Edited on 5-1-2005 by Ranger]