DavidGGraves
Puritan Board Freshman
I am currently reading Michael Horton's God of Promise in it he repeats a line I have seen elsewhere, such as in Geerhardus Vos that the Noahic Covenant with the bow pointing upward is gracious and has no stipulations placed on Noah and his progeny. Sounds good, but I am struck by the explicit stipulations against eating blood and homicide. As both are passing over these issues quickly in an overview they do not even flesh this out. I am wondering what is the standard (is there a standard?) view of these stipulations and their relation to the Noahic Covenant?