August
Puritan Board Freshman
This is an argument made by an atheist opponent in view of the nature of God as the standard for good:
(1) The view that God’s nature is the standard of goodness is committed to claiming that nature of a person (even an all-powerful one) can be the standard of Goodness.
(2) It is possible that there exists an all-powerful person who is all-hating.
(3) The nature of an all-hating all-powerful person cannot be the standard of goodness.
(4) But if the nature of an all-hating all-powerful person cannot be the standard of goodness, then neither can the nature of an all-loving all-powerful person.
I have my own thoughts, but does anyone else want to weigh in?
(1) The view that God’s nature is the standard of goodness is committed to claiming that nature of a person (even an all-powerful one) can be the standard of Goodness.
(2) It is possible that there exists an all-powerful person who is all-hating.
(3) The nature of an all-hating all-powerful person cannot be the standard of goodness.
(4) But if the nature of an all-hating all-powerful person cannot be the standard of goodness, then neither can the nature of an all-loving all-powerful person.
I have my own thoughts, but does anyone else want to weigh in?