Eoghan
Puritan Board Senior
A while ago a friend characterised the disciples as rough fishermen you would want on your side in a bar-fight. Looking at the arrest of Jesus I see some truth in that.
What strikes me is that they were prepared to fight and die (against a cohort of romans that would be the natural outcome Jn 18:3) what they were not prepared for was surrendering Jesus. This was contrary to all their instincts. At this point they left Him - at His request (implied in Jn 18:8 & 11).
They did not flee in cowardly disarray as the account in Mark might suggest. Peter follows in total incomprehension at the events that have overtaken them. To die with a sword in his hand defending Messiah was one thing...
..but this? It is probably in this frame of mind that he distances himself from Jesus. Wanting to understand what was happening took him to the courtyard. Confusion and yes perhaps doubt as to what Messiah's mission really was led him to deny Jesus.
I understand Peter. It would have taken a faith and confidence Peter did not have to trust implicitly in Messiah at this point. This faith he did not have - but he would. Once he comprehended what had been accomplished he became the Apostle Peter.
I would encourage all men to contemplate the disciples in this light. They were men not wimps. Yet it seems they were at this stage limited by their understanding and faith could not take them beyond that.
- the disciples were armed with at least two swords - Luke 22:38
- the disciples surround Jesus Luke 22:49
- the disciples seek permission to strike with swords
- Peter (it would be him) just goes ahead and tries for a head blow , cutting off Malchus' ear - Jn 18:10
- Jesus stops the brawl from happening -John 18:11
- Jesus negotiates the safety of the disciples- Jn 18:8
What strikes me is that they were prepared to fight and die (against a cohort of romans that would be the natural outcome Jn 18:3) what they were not prepared for was surrendering Jesus. This was contrary to all their instincts. At this point they left Him - at His request (implied in Jn 18:8 & 11).
They did not flee in cowardly disarray as the account in Mark might suggest. Peter follows in total incomprehension at the events that have overtaken them. To die with a sword in his hand defending Messiah was one thing...
..but this? It is probably in this frame of mind that he distances himself from Jesus. Wanting to understand what was happening took him to the courtyard. Confusion and yes perhaps doubt as to what Messiah's mission really was led him to deny Jesus.
I understand Peter. It would have taken a faith and confidence Peter did not have to trust implicitly in Messiah at this point. This faith he did not have - but he would. Once he comprehended what had been accomplished he became the Apostle Peter.
I would encourage all men to contemplate the disciples in this light. They were men not wimps. Yet it seems they were at this stage limited by their understanding and faith could not take them beyond that.