aleksanderpolo
Puritan Board Freshman
I disagree. The New Covenant sign of baptism, like the Old Covenant sign of circumcision, represents regeneration.
It's great that you can see the similarity between the circumcision and baptism. That's exactly what I am arguing.
In the Old Covenant, circumcision was the covenant sign. It was applied to those who were in the covenant, including the elect and the non-elect. For the elect, it signify regeneration, for the non-elect, it signify covenant curse.
In the New Covenant, baptism is the covenant sign. It is applied to those who are in the covenant, including the elect and the non-elect. For elect, it signify regeneration, for the non-elect, it signify covenant curse.
There was no disconnect between the sign and the people it is applied to in this view, because covenant member to whom the covenant sign is applied include both the elect and the nonelect in both the Old and New Covenant.
The substance signified by the Old Covenant sign and the New Covenant sign is the same, welcome abroad.