One last point. Richard Muller, a well-respected authority on such matters, states that there was a clear difference between the high orthodox and Warfield on this subject.
PRRD, 2:415.
Turretin and other high and late orthodox writers argued that the authenticity and infallibility of Scripture must be identified in and of the apographa, not in and of lost autographa... The orthodox do, of course, assume that the text is free of substantive error and, typically, view textual problems as of scribal origin, but they mount their argument for authenticity and infallibility without recourse to a logical device like that employed by Hodge and Warfield.
PRRD, 2:415.