Hamalas
whippersnapper
I would be very interested to hear what you guys think about this. Especially you social covenanters. DixieNet.Org :: Official Website of the League of the South!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some Lousy Wikki Site said:Newspaper columnist Thomas B. Edsall has characterized the League of the South as an “extreme right” organization and a “white nationalist” group.
Wouldn't that be "Secession"?I know little about them except from a reference in "Principles of Confederacy" & "Constitutional History of Succession" - the first out of print, the second published by Pelican Books. The author is John Remington Graham; he makes, for me at least, a compelling case for the legality of the succession of the South. He, as I, abhor slavery; explains the problems very well; but it was simply not the issue.
I am quite sympathetic to the South even though I am, as he reveals himself to be, a son of the North - Iowa for me, Minnesota for him.
"Constitutional History of Succession" is well worth the read so long as neither of us get sidetracked from the real battle; I say sidetracked from my own experience of being wrapped up in issues of governance for awhile.
Bob
I would be very interested to hear what you guys think about this. Especially you social covenanters. DixieNet.Org :: Official Website of the League of the South!
I did an MA thesis on the LoS in 2004.
I might dig it up if you send me a PM. I got through two stages with Pelican publishing in Louisiana until they backed out suddenly and their new-books editor resigned. I almost did not graduate because it was "too objective." Coming from out West, I never knew that pro-South topics are streng verboten in the South; my advisor had assigned me the topic, but backed out and refused to read it and I was lucky to get a new committee on the fly. Most people don't realize how universal censorship is in the US.I did an MA thesis on the LoS in 2004.
Did you publish it, or would you post it?
I know little about them except from a reference in "Principles of Confederacy" & "Constitutional History of Seccession" - the first out of print, the second published by Pelican Books. The author is John Remington Graham; he makes, for me at least, a compelling case for the legality of the succession of the South. He, as I, abhor slavery; explains the problems very well; but it was simply not the issue.
The LoS does not believe that secession is a viable option now, but it had hoped that using the possibility of secession in the way Quebec in Canada and the way the Lega Nord in Italy did, it could gain some regional respect for the distinctive history, customs, culture, dialects, and Christian religion of the South.
So they are no longer fighting for secession?