Ken Ham agrees with the atheists

Status
Not open for further replies.
Great article. Ham is right.

I've been considering some things in regard to Genesis 1-10:

1. It's not a God to 'cause light to appear' that looks billions of years old. Even to have it bypass the laws of time and space and appear immediately.

2. The change from the water canopy to the current cloud/rain scene.... what effect does this have (since, obviously, more radiation can now enter the atmosphere) on rocks, people, vegetation, etc.... ?

3. Have we been able to 'fool' radiological dating methods ? (i.e. make something look 'older' than it really is ?)

4. The half-life of U235 is 4.47 billion years, the supposed age of the earth is 4.54 billion years. Somehow, I'm thinking that the U235 found in nature should be even LESS radioactive now (if the earth is really that old), since we've had roughly one 'half-life' cycle for all of it to have decayed into Strontium 90, Thorium and its' other daughter products.

There's a few other thoughts, but these stay on my mind immediately as reasons to question evolution and any attempt to merge it with orthodoxy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top