Magma2
Puritan Board Sophomore
Originally posted by SemperFideles
Thanks to all on this thread. One question:
I noticed in another thread that Dr. R. Scott Clark affirms man in God's image in his entire nature. Dr. Gordon Clark in the God and Logic article posted by Civbert only affirms that man is God's image only in his rational faculties.
Nature without some sort of definition is a meaningless word. Clark argued that logic in man is the image of God since even to understand one command or proposition presupposes reason.
I just don't see a Biblical warrant that our knowledge must be perfect.
Neither do I, but since no empiricist, Christian or otherwise, can seem to provide an explanation of how their theory might work, nor do they ever feel the need to even define sensation much less demonstrate that men actually have them, it seems to me that Clark's rejection of empiricism in its various forms is spot on.
I didn't see a single Scripture quoted in his entire blog article. If we are only left with direct revelation from God, unsure whether He is revealing Truth to us, how can we be sure of anything.
Quick question for you; how did Abraham know it was God telling him to sacrifice Isaac and not Satan?