Carl Copsey
Puritan Board Freshman
So I'm wondering, and I feel like I know this pretty well, but your observations would be very helpful to me!
We all know that theonomists are post-millennials, more specifically, reconstructionists. Here's my question:
Do you see any inconsistencies with one holding to theonomy with an amillennial View?
I'm not asking opinions about theonomy being inconsistent. But whether or not amillennialism is consistent with theonomy.
Sent from my SCH-I545PP using Tapatalk
We all know that theonomists are post-millennials, more specifically, reconstructionists. Here's my question:
Do you see any inconsistencies with one holding to theonomy with an amillennial View?
I'm not asking opinions about theonomy being inconsistent. But whether or not amillennialism is consistent with theonomy.
Sent from my SCH-I545PP using Tapatalk