Several questions: 1) Is the OT prohibition on tatoos part of the judicial law or the moral law? 2) If judicial, and if we aren't theonomists, then getting a tatoo is free game today, right? 3) If moral law, then are not allowing that within the judicial law there are subsets, one of which is moral--which would be binding today? 4) If (3), how is that not a form of theonomy? 5) I want to get a really ferocious looking tatooe. I am thinking of getting a huge tatoo of john knox on my back or arm, though I am open to suggestions.