Andres
Puritan Board Doctor
Sunday evenings at church we have begun studying the Three Forms of Unity, beginning with the Canons of Dordt. The first article in the Canons deals with God’s right to condemn all people. It reads:
Article 1. As all men have sinned in Adam, lie under the curse, and are deserving of eternal death, God would have done no injustice by leaving them all to perish, and delivering them over to condemnation on account of sin, according to the words of the apostle, Rom. 3:19, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. And verse 23: for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God. And Rom. 6:23: for the wages of sin is death.
Of course this opened up the discussion on the related subjects of election and whether or not the doctrine of election itself was fair. Obviously we (humanity) are in no position to question our creator (see Job 38 &39) but at the same time our finite, fallen minds seem to naturally want to object to the fact that some are predestined to salvation and some predestined to damnation. So what is the answer as to why God would choose some to save and leave others to His wrath?
Let us look at it by posing some questions. What if:
1. God wants to demonstrate His wrath and power?
2. God wants to demonstrate His mercy, grace, and love?
How would God do this? He would fashion two different types of people, the elect and the reprobate. But it does not stop there – the beauty of both of these demonstrations is that both of them – the elect and the reprobate - are both unto His glory and His glory alone!
And this is exactly what Paul is trying to get across in Romans 9:13-24. Once the Holy Spirit illuminates this passage to us, can we come to any other conclusion than to say the doctrine of election is completely Soli Deo Gloria!
Article 1. As all men have sinned in Adam, lie under the curse, and are deserving of eternal death, God would have done no injustice by leaving them all to perish, and delivering them over to condemnation on account of sin, according to the words of the apostle, Rom. 3:19, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. And verse 23: for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God. And Rom. 6:23: for the wages of sin is death.
Of course this opened up the discussion on the related subjects of election and whether or not the doctrine of election itself was fair. Obviously we (humanity) are in no position to question our creator (see Job 38 &39) but at the same time our finite, fallen minds seem to naturally want to object to the fact that some are predestined to salvation and some predestined to damnation. So what is the answer as to why God would choose some to save and leave others to His wrath?
Let us look at it by posing some questions. What if:
1. God wants to demonstrate His wrath and power?
2. God wants to demonstrate His mercy, grace, and love?
How would God do this? He would fashion two different types of people, the elect and the reprobate. But it does not stop there – the beauty of both of these demonstrations is that both of them – the elect and the reprobate - are both unto His glory and His glory alone!
And this is exactly what Paul is trying to get across in Romans 9:13-24. Once the Holy Spirit illuminates this passage to us, can we come to any other conclusion than to say the doctrine of election is completely Soli Deo Gloria!